ArticleNeurocritical care2022
CN-105 in Participants with Acute Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage (CATCH) Trial.
Article in Neurocritical care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Apolipoprotein E Mimetic Peptide CN-105 and Postoperative Delirium in Older Patients: The Phase 2 MARBLE Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- CN-105 in Participants with Acute Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage Trial in Singapore (S-CATCH): A Phase 2b, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Review
- Mechanisms, Mediators, and Pharmacological Approaches Targeting Brain Cholesterol Transport in Alzheimer's Disease.Current pharmaceutical design · 2026Review
- Are Hippocampal Hypoperfusion and ATP Depletion Prime Movers in the Genesis of Alzheimer's Disease? A Review of Recent Pertinent Observations from Molecular Biology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Are We Ready for Clinical Therapy based on Cerebral Autoregulation? A Pro-con Debate.Neurocritical care · 2023Article
- ApoE Mimetic Peptides as Therapy for Traumatic Brain Injury.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023Review
- Cerebral Hemorrhage: Pathophysiology, Treatment, and Future Directions.Circulation research · 2022Review
- Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer's disease.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2022Review
- Antagonism of nicotinic acetycholinergic receptors by CN-105, an apoE-mimetic peptide reduces stroke-induced excitotoxicity.Clinical and translational medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
16 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEndogenous apolipoprotein (apo) E mediates neuroinflammatory responses and recovery after brain injury. Exogenously administered apoE-mimetic peptides effectively penetrate the central nervous system compartment and downregulate acute inflammation. CN-105 is a novel apoE-mimetic pentapeptide with excellent evidence of functional and histological improvement in preclinical models of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). The CN-105 in participants with Acute supraTentorial intraCerebral Hemorrhage (CATCH) trial is a first-in-disease-state multicenter open-label trial evaluating safety and feasability of CN-105 administration in patients with acute primary supratentorial ICH.
methodsEligible patients were aged 30-80 years, had confirmed primary supratentorial ICH, and were able to intiate CN-105 administration (1.0 mg/kg every 6 h for 72 h) within 12 h of symptom onset. A priori defined safety end points, including hematoma volume, pharmacokinetics, and 30-day neurological outcomes, were analyzed. For clinical outcomes, CATCH participants were compared 1:1 with a closely matched contemporary ICH cohort through random selection. Hematoma volumes determined from computed tomography images on days 0, 1, 2, and 5 and ordinal modified Rankin Scale score at 30 days after ICH were compared.
resultsIn 38 participants enrolled across six study sites in the United States, adverse events occurred at an expected rate without increase in hematoma expansion or neurological deterioration. CN-105 treatment had an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 2.69 (1.31-5.51) for lower 30-day modified Rankin Scale score, after adjustment for ICH score, sex, and race/ethnicity, as compared with a matched contemporary cohort.
conclusionsCN-105 administration represents an excellent translational candidate for treatment of acute ICH because of its safety, dosing feasibility, favorable pharmacokinetics, and possible improvement in neurological recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.