Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34424456›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2022

Inequities in Adverse Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes: The Effect of Maternal Race and Nativity.

Tejumola M Adegoke, Leeya F Pinder, Ndindam Ndiwane, Samantha E Parker, Olivera Vragovic, Christina D Yarrington

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Clinical risk factors and adverse perinatal outcomes among U.S. and African-born Black women in California.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tejumola M AdegokeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. teadegok@bu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1079-2510
Leeya F PinderDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ndindam NdiwaneBoston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Samantha E ParkerBoston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Olivera VragovicDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Christina D YarringtonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Boston University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the effect of race and ethnicity on differences in maternal and perinatal outcomes among U.S.-born and foreign-born women, as well as racial and ethnic disparities in outcomes within these groups.

methodsThis retrospective study analyzed singleton pregnancies (n = 11,518) among women delivering at Boston Medical Center from January 2010-March 2015. Outcomes of interest included preterm birth, early preterm birth, cesarean delivery, hypertensive disorders, diabetes, low birth weight at term (LBW, < 2500 g), NICU admission and intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD). Prevalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals comparing outcomes between U.S.- and foreign-born women were calculated and stratified by race. Obstetric outcomes among Black and Hispanic women were compared to those of white women within both U.S.- and foreign-born groups.

resultsPreterm birth, hypertensive disorders, LBW and NICU admission were more likely to occur among U.S.-born women and their neonates compared to foreign-born women. Controlling for sociodemographic characteristics did not significantly impact these disparities. Among foreign-born women, Black women had a higher prevalence of many maternal and neonatal complications, while Hispanic women had a lower prevalence of some complications compared to white women. Black woman and infants consistently exhibit worse outcomes regardless of their nativity, while Hispanic women foreign-born women experience less disparate outcomes. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Overall, women born in the United States are at higher risk of several adverse perinatal outcomes compared to foreign-born women. Racial and ethnic disparities in birth outcomes exist in both groups. However, the complex interplay between biopsychosocial influences that mediate these inequities appear to have different effects among U.S- and foreign- born women. A better understanding of these factors can be used to combat disparities and improve outcomes for all women.

Indexed as

Hypertension, Pregnancy-InducedPremature BirthEthnicityFemaleHumansInfantInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornMalePregnancyRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesHealth disparitiesMaternal morbidityPerinatal morbidityRacismSafe birth

Identifiers

PMID34424456
OpenAlexW3195720733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.