Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34424433›Full record

ArticleSurgical case reports2021

Stapling of an endobronchial suction tube with the bronchus during robot-assisted right lower lobectomy: a case report.

Hiroto Tanaka, Teruhiro Aoki, Makoto Oda, Yoshimasa Inoue

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical case reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroto TanakaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Saiseikai Yokohama-shi Tobu Hospital, 3-6-1 Shimosueyoshi, Turumi Ward, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 230-0012, Japan. h.tanaka0709@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2288-9229
Teruhiro AokiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Saiseikai Yokohama-shi Tobu Hospital, 3-6-1 Shimosueyoshi, Turumi Ward, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 230-0012, Japan.
Makoto OdaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shin-yurigaoka General Hospital, 255, Aza-tsuko, Furusawa, Aso Ward, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yoshimasa InoueDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Saiseikai Yokohama-shi Tobu Hospital, 3-6-1 Shimosueyoshi, Turumi Ward, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 230-0012, Japan.
Saiseikai Kanagawa Hospital · JPKawasaki Hospital · JPSaiseikai Yokohama Eastern Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTroubleshooting intraoperative complications requires careful management, and the safest technique should be chosen. We recently experienced a unique intraoperative bronchial complication during pulmonary lobectomy in robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS). There is no consensus on whether to continue RATS or convert to a more familiar technique, such as video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) or thoracotomy, for intraoperative complications that occur during RATS, and the decision should be determined individually. CASE PRESENTATION: A 74-year-old woman with primary lung adenocarcinoma (clinical stage IA2) underwent robot-assisted right lower lobectomy under one-lung ventilation and CO

conclusionThe precise manipulation techniques in RATS contributed to facilitate the successful execution of surgical procedures, such as staple removal and re-suturing of the bronchial stump and may be a useful as a method for such troubleshooting such intraoperative complications.

Indexed as

Anatomical lung resectionIntraoperative complicationRobot-assisted thoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID34424433
PMCPMC8382818
OpenAlexW3193539243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.