ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2021
Modeling stem cell nucleus mechanics using confocal microscopy.
Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Influence of aging on dermal elastin fiber architecture and skin firmness assessed by finite element modeling.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Small Accelerations of the cell generate sufficient nuclear motion to modulate transcriptional activity, driving cellular response independent of matrix strain.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Mechanically Induced Nuclear Shuttling of β-Catenin Requires Co-transfer of Actin.Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Nuclear mechanics is emerging as a key component of stem cell function and differentiation. While changes in nuclear structure can be visually imaged with confocal microscopy, mechanical characterization of the nucleus and its sub-cellular components require specialized testing equipment. A computational model permitting cell-specific mechanical information directly from confocal and atomic force microscopy of cell nuclei would be of great value. Here, we developed a computational framework for generating finite element models of isolated cell nuclei from multiple confocal microscopy scans and simple atomic force microscopy (AFM) tests. Confocal imaging stacks of isolated mesenchymal stem cells were converted into finite element models and siRNA-mediated Lamin A/C depletion isolated chromatin and Lamin A/C structures. Using AFM-measured experimental stiffness values, a set of conversion factors were determined for both chromatin and Lamin A/C to map the voxel intensity of the original images to the element stiffness, allowing the prediction of nuclear stiffness in an additional set of other nuclei. The developed computational framework will identify the contribution of a multitude of sub-nuclear structures and predict global nuclear stiffness of multiple nuclei based on simple nuclear isolation protocols, confocal images and AFM tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.