Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34424381›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2022

Interactive live-stream surgery contributes to surgical education in the context of contact restrictions.

Sara M van Bonn, Jan S Grajek, Armin Schneider, Tobias Oberhoffner, Robert Mlynski, Nora M Weiss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sara M van BonnDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Otto Körner", Rostock University Medical Center, Doberaner Strasse 137-139, D-18057, Rostock, Germany.
Jan S GrajekDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Otto Körner", Rostock University Medical Center, Doberaner Strasse 137-139, D-18057, Rostock, Germany.
Armin SchneiderMunich Surgical Imaging GmbH, Türkenstraße 89, 80799, Munich, Germany.
Tobias OberhoffnerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Otto Körner", Rostock University Medical Center, Doberaner Strasse 137-139, D-18057, Rostock, Germany.
Robert MlynskiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Otto Körner", Rostock University Medical Center, Doberaner Strasse 137-139, D-18057, Rostock, Germany.
Nora M WeissDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Otto Körner", Rostock University Medical Center, Doberaner Strasse 137-139, D-18057, Rostock, Germany. nora-magdalena.weiss@med.uni-rostock.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0645-3591

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAttendance teaching is the predominant teaching method at universities but needs to be questioned in the context of digital transformation. This study establishes and evaluates a method to accomplish electronic learning to supplement traditional attendance courses. MATERIALS AND

methodsSurgery was transmitted in real-time conditions via an online live stream from the surgical theater. Visualization was transferred from a fully digital surgical microscope, an endoscope or an environmental camera in high definition quality. Students were able to participate at home from their personal computer. After following the surgery, they participated in an online-evaluation.

resultsA total of 65 students participated in the live stream. The majority of students (61.54%) indicated a significant subjective increase in knowledge after participation. The majority of students (53.85%) indicated that live surgeries should be offered as a permanent component in addition to classroom teaching. Likewise, a broader offer was desired by many students (63.08%).

conclusionsLive streaming of surgery is a promising approach as an alternative or supplement to traditional attendance teaching. An expansion of digital teaching can be explicitly supported on the basis of this study.

Indexed as

LearningStudentsHumansTeachingCommunicationCOVID-19E-LearningLive surgeryMedical educationOtorhinolaryngology

Identifiers

PMID34424381
PMCPMC8381709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.