ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2022
Dopamine D1R Receptor Stimulation as a Mechanistic Pro-cognitive Target for Schizophrenia.
Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Virtual and CMC-Based Screening Identified Reticuline, an Intermediate of BIA Biosynthesis, as a Potential Agonist of D5R.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Estimation of Dopamine DACS chemical neuroscience · 2025Article
- Characterization of GαiScience · 2025Article
- Translational Evidence for Dopaminergic Rewiring of the Basal Ganglia in Persons with Schizophrenia.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Cortico-striatal circuit mechanisms drive the effects of D1 dopamine agonists on memory capacity in mice through cAMP/PKA signalling.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia: An Update on Research Assessment and the Current and Upcoming Treatment Landscape.CNS drugs · 2025Review
- Knowing is Half the Battle: The Factors Leading to Efficient Recruitment of Representative Samples in Schizophrenia Research.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2025Article
- What Remains to Be Discovered in Schizophrenia Therapeutics: Contributions by Advancing the Molecular Mechanisms of Drugs for Psychosis and Schizophrenia.Biomolecules · 2024Review
- Increased NLRP1 mRNA and Protein Expression Suggests Inflammasome Activation in the Dorsolateral Prefrontal and Medial Orbitofrontal Cortex in Schizophrenia.Biomolecules · 2024Article
- Biomarker Methodologies: A NIMH Perspective.Advances in neurobiology · 2024Review
- The Less Things Change, the More They Remain the Same: Impaired Neural Plasticity as a Critical Target for Drug Development in Neuropsychiatry.Advances in neurobiology · 2024Review
- Medial Prefrontal Cortex Dysfunction Mediates Working Memory Deficits in Patients With Schizophrenia.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2023Article
- Illness Phase as a Key Assessment and Intervention Window for Psychosis.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2023Review
- Dopamine Receptor Ligand Selectivity-An In Silico/In Vitro Insight.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Chlorpromazine, an Inverse Agonist of D1R-Like, Differentially Targets Voltage-Gated Calcium Channel (CaMolecular neurobiology · 2023Article
- Challenges and Strategies for the Recruitment of Patients With Schizophrenia in a Research Setting.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2022Article
- A narrative review of treatment interventions to improve cognitive performance in schizophrenia, with an emphasis on at-risk and early course stages.Psychiatry research · 2022Review
- Progress and Pitfalls in Developing Agents to Treat Neurocognitive Deficits Associated with Schizophrenia.CNS drugs · 2022Review
- Cognitive impairment in psychiatric diseases: Biomarkers of diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Decades of research have highlighted the importance of optimal stimulation of cortical dopaminergic receptors, particularly the D1R receptor (D1R), for prefrontal-mediated cognition. This mechanism is particularly relevant to the cognitive deficits in schizophrenia, given the abnormalities in cortical dopamine (DA) neurotransmission and in the expression of D1R. Despite the critical need for D1R-based therapeutics, many factors have complicated their development and prevented this important therapeutic target from being adequately interrogated. Challenges include determination of the optimal level of D1R stimulation needed to improve cognitive performance, especially when D1R expression levels, affinity states, DA levels, and the resulting D1R occupancy by DA, are not clearly known in schizophrenia, and may display great interindividual and intraindividual variability related to cognitive states and other physiological variables. These directly affect the selection of the level of stimulation necessary to correct the underlying neurobiology. The optimal mechanism for stimulation is also unknown and could include partial or full agonism, biased agonism, or positive allosteric modulation. Furthermore, the development of D1R targeting drugs has been complicated by complexities in extrapolating from in vitro affinity determinations to in vivo use. Prior D1R-targeted drugs have been unsuccessful due to poor bioavailability, pharmacokinetics, and insufficient target engagement at tolerable doses. Newer drugs have recently become available, and these must be tested in the context of carefully designed paradigms that address methodological challenges. In this paper, we discuss how a better understanding of these challenges has shaped our proposed experimental design for testing a new D1R/D5R partial agonist, PF-06412562, renamed CVL-562.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.