Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34423590›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2021

Antiseizure medications for post-stroke epilepsy: A real-world prospective cohort study.

Tomotaka Tanaka, Kazuki Fukuma, Soichiro Abe, Soichiro Matsubara, Rie Motoyama, Masahiro Mizobuchi, Hajime Yoshimura, Takayuki Matsuki, Yasuhiro Manabe, Junichiro Suzuki and 15 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Status epilepticus of carotid web after carotid artery stenting: A case report.The Journal of international medical research · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Tomotaka TanakaDepartment of Neurology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6023-236X
Kazuki FukumaDepartment of Neurology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.
Soichiro AbeDepartment of Neurology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.
Soichiro MatsubaraDepartment of Neurology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Rie MotoyamaDepartment of Neurology, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital and Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.
Masahiro MizobuchiDepartment of Neurology, Nakamura Memorial Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Hajime YoshimuraDepartment of Neurology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Takayuki MatsukiDepartment of Neurology, St. Mary's Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yasuhiro ManabeDepartment of Neurology, National Hospital Organization Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan.
Junichiro SuzukiDepartment of Neurology, Toyota Memorial Hospital, Toyota, Japan.
Shuhei IkedaDepartment of Neurology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.
Naruhiko KamogawaDepartment of Neurology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroyuki IshiyamaDepartment of Neurology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.
Katsuya KobayashiDepartment of Neurology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Akihiro ShimotakeDepartment of Neurology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Kunihiro NishimuraDepartments of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.
Daisuke OnozukaDepartments of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.
Masatoshi KogaDepartment of Cerebrovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.
Kazunori ToyodaDepartment of Cerebrovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.
Shigeo MurayamaDepartment of Neurology, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital and Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.
Riki MatsumotoDivision of Neurology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Ryosuke TakahashiDepartment of Neurology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Akio IkedaDepartment of Epilepsy, Movement Disorders and Physiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Masafumi IharaDepartment of Neurology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7102-4048
PROPOSE Study Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe management of post-stroke epilepsy (PSE) should ideally include prevention of both seizure and adverse effects; however, an optimal antiseizure medications (ASM) regimen has yet been established. The purpose of this study is to assess seizure recurrence, retention, and tolerability of older-generation and newer-generation ASM for PSE.

methodsThis prospective multicenter cohort study (PROgnosis of Post-Stroke Epilepsy [PROPOSE] study) was conducted from November 2014 to September 2019 at eight hospitals. A total of 372 patients admitted and treated with ASM at discharge were recruited. Due to the non-interventional nature of the study, ASM regimen was not adjusted and followed standard hospital practices. The primary outcome was seizure recurrence in patients receiving older-generation and newer-generation ASM. The secondary outcomes were the retention and tolerability of ASM regimens.

resultsOf the 372 PSE patients with ASM at discharge (median [IQR] age, 73 [64-81] years; 139 women [37.4%]), 36 were treated with older-generation, 286 with newer-generation, and 50 with mixed-generation ASM. In older- and newer-generation ASM groups (n = 322), 98 patients (30.4%) had recurrent seizures and 91 patients (28.3%) switched ASM regimen during the follow-up (371 [347-420] days). Seizure recurrence was lower in newer-generation, compared with the older-generation, ASM (hazard ratio [HR], 0.42, 95%CI 0.27-0.70; p = .0013). ASM regimen withdrawal and change of dosages were lower in newer-generation ASM (HR, 0.34, 95% CI 0.21-0.56, p < .0001).

conclusionsNewer-generation ASM possess advantages over older-generation ASM for secondary prophylaxis of post-stroke seizures in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsEpilepsyAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansProspective StudiesSeizuresAnticonvulsantsantiseizure medicationpost-stroke epilepsyretentionseizure recurrencetolerability

Identifiers

PMID34423590
PMCPMC8442594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.