Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34423521›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of language & communication disorders2021

Paediatric oral sensorimotor interventions for chewing dysfunction: A scoping review.

Erin Wilson, Meg Simione, Lydia Polley

Open access · greenAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of language & communication disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Erin WilsonSpeech and Feeding Disorders Laboratory, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6501-7741
Meg SimioneDivision of General Pediatrics, Mass General Hospital for Children, Boston, MA, USA.
Lydia PolleyDepartment of Speech Pathology, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, OH, USA.
Akron Children's Hospital · USHarvard University · USMGH Institute of Health Professions · US

Funding

SPEECH MOVEMENT CLASSIFICATION FOR ASSESSING AND TREATING ALSR01DC013547 · NIDCD · MGH INSTITUTE OF HEALTH PROFESSIONS · PI GREEN, JORDAN R · 2014 to 2018
$3.2M
Deborah Munroe Noonan Memorial Research FundNIDCD NIH HHS 3R01 DC013547-04S1NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013547
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChewing dysfunction can have adverse effects on growth, development and quality of life. There is a lack of evidence-based consensus guidelines for sensorimotor intervention. To address this, we need to understand the current state of the science in clinical sensorimotor interventions for paediatric chewing dysfunction and systematically plan a research agenda and priorities for the field.

aimsThe purpose of this scoping review was to examine the extent, range and nature of evidence for oral sensorimotor interventions for paediatric chewing dysfunction. METHODS & PROCEDURES: This scoping review entailed five phases that included: identification of the research question; identification of relevant studies; study selection; data charting; and collation, summarization and report of the results. Treatment studies that were peer-reviewed and written in English were included. All studies involved a paediatric population and included an oral sensorimotor and/or chewing intervention. Information regarding study design, population, intervention, comparator, outcome measures and findings were extracted. MAIN CONTRIBUTION: Of the 21 studies included in this scoping review, 53% were specific to children with cerebral palsy. All interventions were multi-component in nature and the treatment studies included a range of study designs, but few were controlled trials with comparators. A wide variety of outcomes measures were used within and across studies to determine treatment effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: The findings suggest that in a small number of studies, sensorimotor interventions provide preliminary evidence for effectiveness in specific populations. These and other treatment protocols must be trialled in additional clinical populations and settings to improve the evidence base for sensorimotor treatment of paediatric chewing dysfunction. This review also serves to help prioritize research agendas and further motivates the need for consensus-based clinical guidelines for paediatric chewing treatment. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on the subject Paediatric feeding disorders are highly prevalent and children often have chewing dysfunction that results in significant negative consequences. We lack evidence-based sensorimotor treatment approaches for chewing dysfunction, which directly impacts the care clinicians can provide children. What this study adds to existing knowledge This scoping review is the first step in examining the literature to understand the current state of the science for oral sensorimotor interventions for paediatric chewing dysfunction. Few randomized controlled studies were identified and a majority included children with cerebral palsy. Most of the interventions were multi-component and included a variety of treatment approaches. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The results of this scoping review can be used as an initial reference for clinicians selecting treatment approaches for chewing dysfunction. It also serves to help prioritize research agendas and further motivates the need for consensus-based clinical guidelines for paediatric chewing treatment.

Indexed as

Cerebral PalsyMasticationChildHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareQuality of LifeTreatment Outcomedysphagiafeedingmasticationpaediatricsscoping review

Identifiers

PMID34423521
PMCPMC8585681
OpenAlexW3194830283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.