Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34423431›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy2022

Bone microstructure and bone mineral density are not systemically different in Antarctic icefishes and related Antarctic notothenioids.

Amir M Ashique, Oghenevwogaga J Atake, Katie Ovens, Ruiyi Guo, Isaac V Pratt, H William Detrich, David M L Cooper, Thomas Desvignes, John H Postlethwait, B Frank Eames

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Amir M AshiqueAnatomy, Physiology, and Pharmacology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Oghenevwogaga J AtakeAnatomy, Physiology, and Pharmacology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Katie OvensAugmented Intelligence & Precision Health Laboratory (AIPHL), McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Ruiyi GuoAnatomy, Physiology, and Pharmacology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Isaac V PrattAnatomy, Physiology, and Pharmacology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7839-3922
H William DetrichMarine and Environmental Sciences, Northeastern University Marine Science Center, Nahant, Massachusetts, USA.
David M L CooperAnatomy, Physiology, and Pharmacology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3175-9170
Thomas DesvignesInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5126-8785
John H PostlethwaitInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5476-2137
B Frank EamesAnatomy, Physiology, and Pharmacology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8200-3760

Funding

Developmental Mechanisms for the Evolution of Bone LossR01AG031922 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI POSTLETHWAIT, JOHN H. · 2008 to 2012
$2.4M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG031922NIH HHS R01AG031922
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ancestors of the Antarctic icefishes (family Channichthyidae) were benthic and had no swim bladder, making it energetically expensive to rise from the ocean floor. To exploit the water column, benthopelagic icefishes were hypothesized to have evolved a skeleton with "reduced bone," which gross anatomical data supported. Here, we tested the hypothesis that changes to icefish bones also occurred below the level of gross anatomy. Histology and micro-CT imaging of representative craniofacial bones (i.e., ceratohyal, frontal, dentary, and articular) of extant Antarctic fish species specifically evaluated two features that might cause the appearance of "reduced bone": bone microstructure (e.g., bone volume fraction and structure linear density) and bone mineral density (BMD, or mass of mineral per volume of bone). Measures of bone microstructure were not consistently different in bones from the icefishes Chaenocephalus aceratus and Champsocephalus gunnari, compared to the related benthic notothenioids Notothenia coriiceps and Gobionotothen gibberifrons. Some quantitative measures, such as bone volume fraction and structure linear density, were significantly increased in some icefish bones compared to homologous bones of non-icefish. However, such differences were rare, and no microstructural measures were consistently different in icefishes across all bones and species analyzed. Furthermore, BMD was similar among homologous bones of icefish and non-icefish Antarctic notothenioids. In summary, "reduced bone" in icefishes was not due to systemic changes in bone microstructure or BMD, raising the prospect that "reduced bone" in icefish occurs only at the gross anatomic level (i.e., smaller or fewer bones). Given that icefishes exhibit delayed skeletal development compared to non-icefish Antarctic fishes, combining these phenotypic data with genomic data might clarify genetic changes driving skeletal heterochrony.

Indexed as

Bone DensityPerciformesAnimalsAntarctic RegionsFishesAntarctic icefishbone microstructurebone mineral densitycomparative anatomymicro-CTnotothenioidskeletal evolution

Identifiers

PMID34423431
PMCPMC8655173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.