ArticleBrain communications2021
Individualized response to semantic versus phonological aphasia therapies in stroke.
Article in Brain communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting Outcomes of Language Rehabilitation: Prognostic Factors for Immediate and Long-Term Outcomes After Aphasia Therapy.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023Trial
- Language Recovery after Brain Injury: A Structural Network Control Theory Study.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Trial
- Beyond the Plateau: Repeated Treatment Opportunities Are Associated with Improved Naming in Chronic Post-Stroke Aphasia.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Narrative Discourse Predictors of Response to Naming Intervention in Aphasia.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Article
- Characterizing Verb Argument Structure in Aphasia Using Dependency Parsers.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Article
- Digital Twin Model of Treatment Outcomes in Post-Stroke Aphasia.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Gene Expression-Based Lesion-Symptom Mapping:The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Network flexibility facilitates treatment-induced recovery in post-stroke aphasia.Brain communications · 2026Article
- PICTURE-IT: a pilot randomized cross-over trial encouraging right-hemisphere engagement for the treatment of aphasia via telemedicine.Aphasiology · 2025Article
- Naming practice effects and inconsistencies relate to treatment outcome in people with aphasia.Neuropsychologia · 2025Article
- Cognitive Functions Supporting Learning Over Time in Naming Treatment for Aphasia.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025Article
- An Introduction to Machine Learning for Speech-Language Pathologists: Concepts, Terminology, and Emerging Applications.Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Predictions of Recovery in Bilingual Poststroke Aphasia: Aligning Insights With Clinical Evidence.Stroke · 2025Article
- Charting the Course of Aphasia Recovery: Factors, Trajectories, and Outcomes.Annual review of linguistics · 2025Article
- Neural Predictors for the Generalization of Semantic and Phonological Treatment to Discourse Performance in Chronic Post-Stroke Aphasia.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Advanced brain aging mediates the relationship between cardiovascular health and aphasia severity in chronic stroke.Aging brain · 2025Article
- TEleRehabilitation foR Aphasia (TERRA) phase II trial design.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2024Article
- The Aphasia Recovery Cohort, an open-source chronic stroke repository.Scientific data · 2024Article
- An exploration of anomia rehabilitation in drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy.Epilepsy & behavior reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Attempts to personalize aphasia treatment to the extent where it is possible to reliably predict individual response to a particular treatment have yielded inconclusive results. The current study aimed to (i) compare the effects of phonologically versus semantically focussed naming treatment and (ii) examine biographical and neuropsychological baseline factors predictive of response to each treatment. One hundred and four individuals with chronic post-stroke aphasia underwent 3 weeks of phonologically focussed treatment and 3 weeks of semantically focussed treatment in an unblinded cross-over design. A linear mixed-effects model was used to compare the effects of treatment type on proportional change in correct naming across groups. Correlational analysis and stepwise regression models were used to examine biographical and neuropsychological predictors of response to phonological and semantic treatment across all participants. Last, chi-square tests were used to explore the association between treatment response and phonological and semantic deficit profiles. Semantically focussed treatment was found to be more effective at the group-level, independently of treatment order (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.