Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34423234›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary human sciences2020

The ethics and logistics of field-based genetic paternity studies.

Brooke A Scelza, Elizabeth G Atkinson, Sean Prall, Richard McElreath, Jacob Sheehama, Brenna M Henn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary human sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Brooke A ScelzaCenter for Behavior, Evolution and Culture, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5875-8875
Elizabeth G AtkinsonBroad Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6308-776X
Sean PrallCenter for Behavior, Evolution and Culture, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Richard McElreathDepartment of Human Behavior, Evolution and Culture, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig 04103, Germany.
Jacob SheehamaMedical Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Namibia, Oshakati, Namibia.
Brenna M HennDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
Broad Institute · USMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology · DEStony Brook University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Missouri · USUniversity of Namibia · NA

Funding

Supplement: Improving Inference of Genetic Architecture and Selection with African GenomesR35GM133531 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI HENN, BRENNA M · 2019 to 2023
$2.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM133531
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapidly decreasing costs of generating genetic data sequencing and the ease of new DNA collection technologies have opened up new opportunities for anthropologists to conduct field-based genetic studies. An exciting aspect of this work comes from linking genetic data with the kinds of individual-level traits evolutionary anthropologists often rely on, such as those collected in long-term demographic and ethnographic studies. However, combining these two types of data raises a host of ethical questions related to the collection, analysis and reporting of such data. Here we address this conundrum by examining one particular case, the collection and analysis of paternity data. We are particularly interested in the logistics and ethics involved in genetic paternity testing in the localized settings where anthropologists often work. We discuss the particular issues related to paternity testing in these settings, including consent and disclosure, consideration of local identity and beliefs and developing a process of continued community engagement. We then present a case study of our own research in Namibia, where we developed a multi-tiered strategy for consent and community engagement, built around a double-blind procedure for data collection, analysis and reporting.

Indexed as

anthropological geneticsethicsmethodspaternity

Identifiers

PMID34423234
PMCPMC8378665
OpenAlexW3024480502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.