ArticleACS omega2021
Experimental Study on the Cement-Based Materials Used in Coal Mine Gas Extraction for Hole Sealing.
Article in ACS omega, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Composite Fibers and Nanosilica on the Properties of Cement-Based Sealing Materials.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Air Leakage Characteristics of Gas Boreholes in Deep Coal Seams and Application of Short-Hole Grouting and Plugging.ACS omega · 2024Article
- The Hole Sealing Technology of Solid-Liquid Materials with Three Pluggings and Two Injections for Gas Extraction Hole in the Coal Mine.ACS omega · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gas drainage is an important method to prevent and control gas disasters. Sealing materials have an important impact on the gas drainage effect. To improve the extraction rate, the configuration and related characteristics of sealing materials were studied in this study. It was found that the fluidity increased gradually with the increase of the dosage of the suspension concentrate (SC). The water-cement ratio was directly proportional to the setting time of the slurry. Also, the mixing amount of the special cement was inversely proportional to the setting time of the slurry. The influence of the amount of foaming agent, special cement, and suspending agent on the expansion rate of the slurry was positive, and the influence gradually weakened. When the water-cement ratio of cement-based materials was 0.6, the special cement content percentage was 6, the suspension agent content percentage was 3, the plasticizer content percentage was 0.7, the early strength agent content percentage was 1.2, and the foaming agent content percentage was 0.2, the sealing effect was the best. The research results suggest that the porosity and pore length of the cement-based material are smaller than those of polyurethane, and its sealing property was better. This could further increase the sealing effect of the gas borehole, thereby facilitating gas extraction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.