Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34423150›Full record

ArticleEngaging science, technology, and society2017

The Ethics of Translational Science: Imagining Public Benefit in Gene-Environment Interaction Research.

Sara L Ackerman, Katherine Weatherford Darling, Sandra Soo-Jin Lee, Robert A Hiatt, Janet K Shim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Engaging science, technology, and society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sara L AckermanUniversity of California San Francisco.
Katherine Weatherford DarlingUniversity of California Santa Cruz.
Sandra Soo-Jin LeeStanford University.
Robert A HiattUniversity of California San Francisco.
Janet K ShimUniversity of California San Francisco.

Funding

Conceptions of Race and Ethnicity Used in Gene-Environment Interaction StudiesR01HG005848 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SHIM, JANET K · 2010 to 2013
$1.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG005848
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomedical research is increasingly informed by expectations of "translation," which call for the production of scientific knowledge that can be used to create services and products that improve health outcomes. In this paper, we ask how translation, in particular the idea of social responsibility, is understood and enacted in the post-genomic life sciences. Drawing on theories examining what constitutes "good science," and interviews with 35 investigators who study the role of gene-environment interactions in the etiology of cancer, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease, we describe the dynamic and unsettled

Indexed as

ethicsgene-environment interactionspost-genomic sciencetranslational research

Identifiers

PMID34423150
PMCPMC8376214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.