Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34423103›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in behavioral sciences2021

Computational theory-driven studies of reinforcement learning and decision-making in addiction: What have we learned?

Maëlle C M Gueguen, Emma M Schweitzer, Anna B Konova

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Rapid and reliable computational markers of decision-making for predicting daily smoking behavior and smoking cessation treatment outcomes.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maëlle C M GueguenDepartment of Psychiatry, University Behavioral Health Care, & the Brain Health Institute, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, Piscataway, USA.
Emma M SchweitzerDepartment of Psychiatry, University Behavioral Health Care, & the Brain Health Institute, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, Piscataway, USA.
Anna B KonovaDepartment of Psychiatry, University Behavioral Health Care, & the Brain Health Institute, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, Piscataway, USA.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Project-003UG1DA013035 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Aimee N Campbell, Jennifer McNeely · 2015 to 2026
$130.3M
Computational neuroeconomic models of addiction: quantifying progression and treatment in opioid use disorderR01DA043676 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI GLIMCHER, PAUL W, ROTROSEN, JOHN P · 2017 to 2021
$2.1M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA043676NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA013035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational psychiatry provides a powerful new approach for linking the behavioral manifestations of addiction to their precise cognitive and neurobiological substrates. However, this emerging area of research is still limited in important ways. While research has identified features of reinforcement learning and decision-making in substance users that differ from health, less emphasis has been placed on capturing addiction cycles/states dynamically, within-person. In addition, the focus on few behavioral variables at a time has precluded more detailed consideration of related processes and heterogeneous clinical profiles. We propose that a longitudinal and multidimensional examination of value-based processes, a type of dynamic "computational fingerprint", will provide a more complete understanding of addiction as well as aid in developing better tailored and timed interventions.

Identifiers

PMID34423103
PMCPMC8376201
OpenAlexW3101251354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.