ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2021
Clubfoot treatment in China before and after the advent of the Ponseti technique: a historical narrative review.
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Treatment outcome of the Ponseti method for clubfoot in Africa : a systematic review and meta-analysis.Bone & joint open · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital clubfoot (CF) was first described by Hippocrates in approximately 400 B.C. In ancient China, manipulations were widely used to correct CF, but the outcomes were frequently unsatisfactory with residual deformity even if corrective devices were used. The advent of aseptic surgery and anesthesia has favored the development of different surgical procedures to manage children with CF. Surgical treatment became extremely popular in China during the years 1960-1990 due to the good clinical foot appearance post-surgery. However, the poor mid- to long-term results of surgical treatment facilitated the return of conservative treatment, i.e., the Ponseti technique. Over the past decade, the Ponseti technique has become very popular in China. The Ponseti technique is essentially conservative and it is based on a good understanding of CF pathophysiology. Casts are changed once a week and Achilles tenotomy is performed if equinus persists at the end of treatment. Although highly successful on the short to mid-term, the Ponseti technique is not able to completely eradicate surgery, and recurrence is still possible. As the etiology of CF is still unclear, the first mission for doctors and researchers all over the world is to truly understand the pathogenesis of the deformity. Even though genetics seems to play an important role, successful gene therapy is still a distant goal. This narrative review aims to investigate the history of CF treatment in China, to describe its tortuous process and to potentially inspire new ideas to create new effective methods of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.