Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34423017›Full record

ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2021

This is a narrative review of the functional evaluation of clubfoot treatment with gait analysis.

Lori A Karol, Kelly A Jeans

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lori A KarolChildren's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Kelly A JeansScottish Rite for Children, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Children's Hospital Colorado · USTexas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinicians worldwide have embraced Ponseti's nonoperative approach in the treatment of clubfoot, primarily due to ubiquitous reports of successful outcomes. A crucial component in this measured success, has come from researchers assessing long-term physical function following nonoperative treatment. Gait analysis has been instrumental in objectively evaluating lower extremity kinematics and kinetics while plantar pressures demonstrate the load bearing patterns experienced in the foot. As technology improves, our ability to evaluate function can take place both in the laboratory setting, and in the community. For over 20 years, our institution has been studying the gait patterns of children treated for clubfoot. After adopting the nonoperative approach, we established a prospective research program that has allowed us to study functional outcomes in the very young walker, through growth to adolescents, and finally at skeletal maturity. We have seen over 450 children treated for clubfoot in the Movement Science Lab, for over 1,250 gait assessments over the span of this study. Early results in 105 children (154 feet) treated nonoperatively for clubfoot, showed 56% of children had normal sagittal plane ankle kinematics, however an incidence of 48% of Ponseti feet had increased dorsiflexion in stance phase, leading us to wonder if this was the result of the tenotomy. Intermediate follow up at age 5 years, showed that the incidence of increased dorsiflexion was reduced (24%) and ankle power did not appear to be affected (P>0.05 compared to controls). The research highlighted in this paper presents the application of functional evaluation through growth and the long-term effects of nonoperative treatment on gait and function. This is a review of the functional outcome studies from our experience at Scottish Rite for Children.

Indexed as

ClubfootFrench physiotherapygait analysisPonsetitalipes equinovarus

Identifiers

PMID34423017
PMCPMC8339835
OpenAlexW3162266093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.