Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34423008›Full record

ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2021

Clubfoot pathoanatomy-biomechanics of deformity correction: a narrative review.

Vincent S Mosca

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Congenital talipes equinovarus: A literature review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vincent S MoscaUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Seattle Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clubfoot is a common and complex, multi-segmental, 3-dimensional, congenital foot deformity. The segmental deformities have been recognized for millennia. They are cavus of the forefoot/midfoot, adductus of the midfoot, varus of the hindfoot, and equinus of the ankle, often referred to by the acronym CAVE. However, description of the deformities and their correction have varied over time with changes in consensus terminology for foot deformities and the understanding of foot biomechanics. In this narrative review, the most current terminology for foot deformities and understanding of foot biomechanics are applied to the clubfoot. The concept of the calcaneopedal unit (CPU) is applied to the in-depth discussion and understanding of clubfoot for perhaps the first time in the English language literature. Of the 4 basic clubfoot deformities, cavus and adductus are static structural deformities within the CPU, i.e., all bones of the foot except the talus. Varus is a restricted dynamic deformity between the CPU and the talus. Equinus is a restricted dynamic deformity in the ankle joint between the talus and the tibia. Understanding the CPU concept improves ones understanding of clubfoot deformities and the rationale for treatment techniques. Consensual agreement on the terms used to define interosseous relationships and motions in the foot improves communication. Finally, this narrative review highlights the histologic and biologic changes that occur in collagen and cartilage during clubfoot deformity correction to provide further understanding and rationale for treatment.

Indexed as

acetabulum pedisbiomechanicscalcaneopedal unit (CPU)Clubfootpathoanatomy

Identifiers

PMID34423008
PMCPMC8339823
OpenAlexW3175310923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.