Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34423004›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021

Complication and lung function impairment prediction using perfusion and computed tomography air trapping (CLIPPCAIR): protocol for the development and validation of a novel multivariable model for the prediction of post-resection lung function.

Carey Meredith Suehs, Laurence Solovei, Kheira Hireche, Isabelle Vachier, Denis Mariano Goulart, Lucie Gamon, Jérémy Charriot, Isabelle Serre, Nicolas Molinari, Arnaud Bourdin and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03885765 (Complication and Lung Function Impairment Prediction Using Perfusion and CT Air Trapping), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03885765 completednot on this map

Complication and Lung Function Impairment Prediction Using Perfusion and CT Air Trapping (CLIPPCAIR): Protocol for the Development and Validation of a Novel Algorithm for Post-resection Lung Function

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, MontpellierRan2020 to 2025Enrolled160ConditionsNon-small Cell Lung CancerArmsPredictive data, Lung resection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carey Meredith SuehsDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, The University of Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Laurence SoloveiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The University of Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Kheira HirecheDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The University of Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Isabelle VachierDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, The University of Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Denis Mariano GoulartDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The University of Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Lucie GamonDepartment of Medical Information, The University of Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Jérémy CharriotDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, The University of Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Isabelle SerreDepartment of Pathology, The University of Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Nicolas MolinariIMAG, CNRS, The University of Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Arnaud BourdinDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, The University of Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Sébastien BommartPhyMedExp, CNRS, INSERM, The University of Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Université de Montpellier · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent advancements in computed tomography (CT) scanning and post processing have provided new means of assessing factors affecting respiratory function. For lung cancer patients requiring resection, and especially those with respiratory comorbidities such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the ability to predict post-operative lung function is a crucial step in the lung cancer operability assessment. The primary objective of the CLIPPCAIR study is to use novel CT data to develop and validate an algorithm for the prediction of lung function remaining after pneumectomy/lobectomy.

methodsTwo sequential cohorts of non-small cell lung cancer patients requiring a pre-resection CT scan will be recruited at the Montpellier University Hospital, France: a test population (N=60) on which predictive models will be developed, and a further model validation population (N=100). Enrolment will occur during routine pre-surgical consults and follow-up visits will occur 1 and 6 months after pneumectomy/lobectomy. The primary outcome to be predicted is forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) six months after lung resection. The baseline CT variables that will be used to develop the primary multivariable regression model are: expiratory to inspiratory ratios of mean lung density (MLD DISCUSSION: Current methods for estimating post-resection lung function are imperfect and can add assessments (such as scintigraphy) to the pre-surgical workup. By using CT imaging data in a novel fashion, the results of the CLIPPCAIR study may not only improve such estimates, it may also simplify patient pathways.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov (NCT03885765).

Indexed as

lobectomymean lung densityNon-small cell lung cancerpneumectomyrespiratory function

Identifiers

PMID34423004
PMCPMC8339869
OpenAlexW3180055243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.