ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021
Cell-free DNA from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF): a new liquid biopsy medium for identifying lung cancer.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Knowledge mapping analysis of ground glass nodules: a bibliometric analysis from 2013 to 2023.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical value of blood circulating tumor RNA (ctRNA) in liquid biopsy of lung cancer: a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Review
- Multidimensional biomarker profiling of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of lung cancer: a retrospective observational study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- An integrated proteomic classifier to distinguish benign from malignant pulmonary nodules.Clinical proteomics · 2025Article
- Minimally invasive biomarkers for triaging lung nodules-challenges and future perspectives.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2025Review
- Biomarkers in lung cancer diagnosis and bronchoscopy: Current landscape and future directions.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2025Review
- Detection of lung allograft injury through a comprehensive multidisciplinary analysis of donor-derived cell-free DNA in plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage: a real-world single center experience.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Aggregation-Induced Emission Luminogen: Role in Biopsy for Precision Medicine.Chemical reviews · 2024Review
- Discrimination of Lung Cancer and Benign Lung Diseases Using BALF Exosome DNA Methylation Profile.Cancers · 2024Article
- Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid assessment facilitates precision medicine for lung cancer.Cancer biology & medicine · 2023Review
- A Systematic Role of Metabolomics, Metabolic Pathways, and Chemical Metabolism in Lung Cancer.Vaccines · 2023Review
- A novel approach for the non-invasive diagnosis of pulmonary nodules using low-depth whole-genome sequencing of cell-free DNA.Translational lung cancer research · 2022Article
- Genomic Profiling of Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid in Lung Cancer.Cancer research · 2022Article
- Cell Free Methylated Tumor DNA in Bronchial Lavage as an Additional Tool for Diagnosing Lung Cancer-A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2022Review
- The utility of sputum supernatant as an alternative liquid biopsy specimen for next-generation sequencing-based somatic variation profiling.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Combinatorial Power of cfDNA, CTCs and EVs in Oncology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Bronchoalveolar Lavage as Potential Diagnostic Specimens to Genetic Testing in Advanced Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDifferentiating malignant lung tumors from benign pulmonary nodules is a great challenge. While the analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) is used for diagnosing infections and interstitial lung diseases, there is limited evidence to support its use for lung cancer diagnosis. This study aimed to interrogate the potential of using BALF cell-free DNA (cfDNA) to discriminate malignant lesions from benign nodules.
methodsFifty-three patients with solid pulmonary nodules (≤2 cm) were prospectively enrolled, including 21 confirmed with benign disease and 32 with malignant tumors. Mutations were profiled for 30 tumor tissues and 40 BALFs. Paired BALFs and plasma from 48 patients underwent DNA methylation profiling. A methylome-based classification model was developed for BALF and plasma separately.
resultsAmong the 30 patients with paired tissues and BALFs, 96.7% and 70% had alterations detected from their tissues (79 alterations) and BALFs (53 alterations), respectively. Using tissues as references, BALFs revealed 14 new alterations and missed 41. BALF mutation displayed a sensitivity of 71%, specificity of 77.8%, and accuracy of 72.5% in detecting lung cancer. BALF methylation achieved an accuracy of 81.3%, with both sensitivity and specificity being 81%. Plasma methylation showed a 66.7% sensitivity, 71.4% specificity, and 68.8% accuracy. BALF methylation also demonstrated 82.4% sensitivity in stage I patients. Parallel bronchoscopy, lavage cytology, and bronchial brushing demonstrated an inferior sensitivity of 23%, 3.1%, and 9.7%, respectively, compared with BALF methylation and mutation (P<0.0001).
conclusionsBALF cfDNA can serve as a liquid biopsy media for both mutation and methylation profiling, demonstrating better sensitivities in distinguishing small malignant tumors from benign nodules than conventional methods. KEYWORDS: Lung cancer diagnosis; pulmonary nodule; bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF); methylation; genomic mutation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.