Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34422978›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021

CYP2C19 genotype has prognostic value in specific populations following coronary stenting.

Wenyao Wang, Chunli Shao, Bo Xu, Jingjia Wang, Min Yang, Jing Chen, Kuo Zhang, Siyuan Wang, Ping Li, Yi-Da Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. International journal of general medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Wenyao WangDepartment of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Chunli ShaoDepartment of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Bo XuCatheterization Laboratory, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jingjia WangDepartment of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Min YangDepartment of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jing ChenDepartment of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Kuo ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Siyuan WangDepartment of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Ping LiDepartment of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yi-Da TangDepartment of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prognostic value of the CYP2C19 genotype in post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients remains controversial. The recently-published, limited-sample PHARMCLO trial indicates a personalized pharmacogenomic approach may reduce adverse events. This study aimed to determine the prognostic value of CYP2C19 genotypes.

methodsThe original cohort consisted of 10,724 PCI patients in 2013. 756 patients with genotyped CYP2C19 were included in our analysis. The CYP2C19 genotype prognostic value was tested based on different clinical factors. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardio- and cerebro-vascular event (MACCE).

resultsMACCE 2-years post-PCI occurred in 19 patients (17.4%) in poor metabolizers (PM, CYP2C19 *2/*2, *2/*3, *3/*3), 43 patients (12.2%) in intermediate metabolizers (IM, CYP2C19 *1/*2 or *1/*3) and 27 patients (9.2%) in extensive metabolizers (EM, CYP2C19 *1/*1). PM was an independent MACCE predictor compared with EM (HR: 1.960, 95% CI: 1.139-3.372), but the difference between IM and PM was not significant (HR: 1.314, 95% CI: 0.843-2.048). Major bleeding (BARC grade ≥3) was not significantly different between the three groups (2.5%

conclusionsUtilizing CYP2C19 genotype to guide post-PCI antiplatelet therapy might be appropriate in patients with the following characteristics: male, age >60 years, BMI >24 kg/m

Indexed as

antiplateletclopidogrelpercutaneous coronary interventionPharmacogenomics

Identifiers

PMID34422978
PMCPMC8339845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.