Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34422618›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of nursing and midwifery research

Emotional Intelligence and Quality of Nursing Care: A Need for Continuous Professional Development.

Elmira Khademi, Mohammad Abdi, Mohammad Saeidi, Shahram Piri, Robab Mohammadian

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elmira KhademiDepartment of Nursing, Maragheh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Maragheh, Iran.
Mohammad AbdiStudent of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad SaeidiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
Shahram PiriDepartment of Nursing, Maragheh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Maragheh, Iran.
Robab MohammadianDepartment of Nursing, Maragheh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Maragheh, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmotional Intelligence (EI) is necessary for personal and professional success. This study aimed to determine the relationship between EI and quality of nursing care from the viewpoint of nurses and patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis descriptive correlational study was conducted using convenience sampling to select the patients (

resultsThe mean (SD) score of EI was 91.17 (12.33) in nurses, and the mean (SD) score of nursing care quality was 184.01 (37.41) and 202.22 (22.30) from the viewpoint of patients and nurses, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two viewpoints (

conclusionsEI positively affects the quality of nursing care and its dimensions. Therefore, it is recommended that nursing policymakers consider educational programs to strengthen the nurses' EI and enhance the quality of nursing care. Patients, similar to nurses, can be proper indicators of the quality of nursing care; accordingly, simultaneous use of these indicators is suggested.

Indexed as

Emotional intelligencenursespatientsquality of health care

Identifiers

PMID34422618
PMCPMC8344623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.