ArticleGland surgery2021
Improved Inception V3 method and its effect on radiologists' performance of tumor classification with automated breast ultrasound system.
Article in Gland surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- YOLO AI model based on an automated breast volume scanner for the detection of benign and malignant breast lesions.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- A Novel Deep Learning Model to Distinguish Malignant Versus Benign Solid Lung Nodules.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022Article
- Evaluation of a new method of calculating breast tumor volume based on automated breast ultrasound.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe automated breast ultrasound system (ABUS) is recognized as a valuable detection tool in addition to mammography. The purpose of this study was to propose a novel computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system by extracting the textural features from ABUS images and to investigate the efficiency of using this CAD for breast cancer detection.
methodsThis retrospective study involved 149 breast nodules [maximum diameter: mean size 18.89 mm, standard deviation (SD) 10.238, and range 5-59 mm] in 135. We assigned 3 novice readers (<3 years of experience and 3 experienced readers (≥10 years of experience to review the imaging data and stratify the 149 breast nodules as either malignant or benign. The Improved Inception V3 (II3) method was developed and used as an assistant tool to help the 6 readers to re-interpret the images.
resultsOur method (II3) achieved an accuracy of 88.6% for the final result. The 3 novice readers had an average accuracy of 71.37%±4.067% while the 3 experienced readers was 83.03%±3.371% on the first-reading. With the help of II3 on the second-reading, the average accuracy of the novice readers increased to 84.13%±1.662% and the experienced readers increased to 89.50%±0.346%.The areas under the curve (AUCs) were similar compared with linear algorithms. The mean AUC of the novice readers was improved from 0.7751 (without II3) to 0.8232 (with II3). The mean AUC of the experienced readers was improved from 0.8939 (without II3) to 0.9211 (with II3). The mean AUC for all readers improved in both the second-reading mode (from 0.8345 to 0.8722, P=0.0081<0.05).
conclusionsWith the help of the II3, the diagnostic accuracy of the two groups were both improved, and II3 was more helpful for novice readers than for experienced readers. Our results showed that II3 is valuable in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast nodules and it also improves the experience and skill of some novice radiologists. The II3 cannot completely replace the influence of experience in the diagnostic process and will retain an auxiliary role in the clinic at present.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.