ArticleAnnals of cardiothoracic surgery2021
Long-term outcomes of the Ross procedure in adults.
Article in Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rupture and dissection of aortic autograft following the ross procedure: a systematic review.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Perioperative Factors Associated with Delayed Extubation After the Ross Procedure for Aortic Regurgitation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Long-term clinical outcomes in patients aged 50 to 70 years old undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement in the United Kingdom.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- Lifetime Management of Aortic Stenosis: Evolving Strategies and Personalized Decision-Making.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Ross Procedure Renaissance: A Contemporary Review of Patient Selection, Technique, and Long-Term Outcomes in Adults.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Review
- Was an aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve the right option all along? Cogan's syndrome with recurrent aortic regurgitation: a case of evolving surgical decisions.Oxford medical case reports · 2025Article
- Resequenced Ross pulmonary autograft procedure: Novel approach with beating heart predominance to minimize cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times.JTCVS techniques · 2025Article
- Options for pediatric heart valve replacement.Future cardiology · 2025Review
- Considerations for lifetime management of aortic stenosis: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement, surgical aortic valve replacement, and timing of therapy.JTCVS structural and endovascular · 2024Article
- The Ross Procedure: Imaging, Outcomes and Future Directions in Aortic Valve Replacement.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of time-to-event long-term outcomes following the Ross procedure.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Mentoring the Ross Procedure in Adults Does Not Compromise Perioperative or Long-term Outcomes.Annals of thoracic surgery short reports · 2023Article
- Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis with and without Aortopathy: Considerations for Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement versus Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.US cardiology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe optimal aortic valve replacement for young and middle-aged adults remains elusive. Although several high-volume international centers and surgeons have demonstrated excellent long-term results with the pulmonary autograft (Ross procedure) in adult patients, current guidelines from the United States do not favor this technique. We evaluated long-term clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of adult patients undergoing the Ross procedure at our center.
methodsA retrospective review of 225 consecutive adult patients undergoing the Ross procedure was completed. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to evaluate overall survival, which was then compared to an age- and sex-matched general population with the log-rank test. Accounting for death as a competing hazard, the cumulative incidence of reintervention and autograft or homograft dysfunction were estimated over the long-term.
resultsMean age was 42±11 years, and 62 (28%) patients were at least 50 years old. A bicuspid aortic valve was present in 179 (80%) patients. The most common indications for surgery were aortic insufficiency (n=94, 43%), aortic stenosis (n=81, 36%), and mixed etiology (n=46, 21%). In-hospital mortality was 0.9%. Overall survival (with 95% confidence intervals) at 1-, 10- and 20-year was 97.8% (95.9-99.7%), 94.2% (91.0-97.4%), and 81.3% (74.8-88.3%), respectively. Overall survival approximated that of the general population (log-rank P=0.32). The cumulative incidence (with 95% confidence intervals) of any autograft or homograft reintervention at 10-, 15-, and 20-year was 16% (12-20%), 28% (21-35%), and 45% (36-54%), respectively.
conclusionsThe Ross procedure restores a normal life expectancy to young and middle-aged adults with severe aortic valve disease. The need for reintervention increases steadily during the second decade after the Ross procedure, but less than half of patients require any reintervention for up to 20-year.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.