Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34422547›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in rheumatology2021

Therapeutic management of immune-mediated necrotizing myositis.

Emma Weeding, Eleni Tiniakou

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emma WeedingDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Mason Lord, Center Tower, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 5200 Eastern Avenue, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
Eleni TiniakouDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Mason Lord, Center Tower, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 5200 Eastern Avenue, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Multidisciplinary Rheumatology Training ProgramT32AR048522 · NIAMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CLIFTON O BINGHAM, LIVIA A CASCIOLA-ROSEN · 2003 to 2026
$6.4M
NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR048522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are a heterogeneous group of autoimmune disorders characterized by skeletal muscle inflammation leading to chronic muscle weakness. Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) is a distinct subgroup of inflammatory myopathy typically characterized by myofiber necrosis with minimal inflammatory infiltrates on muscle biopsy, highly elevated creatine kinase levels, and infrequent extra-muscular involvement. This review provides an overview of currently recommended treatment strategies for IMNM, including discussion of disease activity monitoring and recommended first-line immunomodulatory agents depending on clinical phenotype and autoantibody status. RECENT

findingsIMNM can be divided into three subtypes based on autoantibody positivity: anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR) IMNM, anti-signal recognition particle (SRP) IMNM, and antibody negative IMNM. Autoantibody status in IMNM has considerable correlation with clinical phenotype, prognosis, and recommended choice of immunosuppressive agent. Patients with anti-HMGCR IMNM tend to respond well to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and IVIG monotherapy may be sufficient treatment for certain patients. In anti-SRP IMNM, early rituximab is commonly favored. More generally, prompt initiation of aggressive immunosuppression is often indicated, as both anti-SRP and anti-HMGCR IMNM can potentially cause debilitating weakness, and muscle atrophy and irreversible fatty replacement happen early in the disease course. Patients with IMNM frequently require combination therapy to achieve disease control, and have a high rate of relapse when tapering immunosuppression. Young age of onset is a poor prognostic factor. SUMMARY: IMNM can be severely disabling and often requires aggressive immunosuppression. For any given patient, the treatment strategy should be informed by the severity of their presenting features and autoantibody status. While our ability to treat IMNM has certainly improved, there remains a need for more prospective trials to inform optimal treatment strategies.

Indexed as

HMGCRIdiopathic inflammatory myopathiesImmunosuppressionNecrotizing myositisSignal recognition particleTreatment

Identifiers

PMID34422547
PMCPMC8378663
OpenAlexW3147180312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.