ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2021
Prognostic value of copeptin in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Copeptin and the prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.Irish journal of medical science · 2023Pooled it
- Diagnostic Potential of Metabolomic and Proteomic Biomarkers in Cardiology-A Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- The Impact of Hydration on Metabolic Outcomes: From Arginine-Vasopressin Signaling to Clinical Implications.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Novel Biomarkers and Their Role in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- From Classic to Modern Prognostic Biomarkers in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIschemic myocardial injury leads to neurohormonal system activation and increased release of copeptin. Although diagnostic value of copeptin has been widely described, data on its prognostic performance in patients with myocardial infarction is inconclusive. The aim of this study was to asses if elevated copeptin concentration provides prognostic information for long-term adverse cardiac events in a cohort of first acute myocardial infarction patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.
methodsCopeptin concentration was assessed in a cohort of 100 consecutive patients (39% women; mean age 63±7 years) presenting with first acute myocardial infarction and subjected to percutaneous coronary intervention. Samples were collected at the time of admission and on the 4
resultsElevated copeptin concentration on the 4
conclusionsCopeptin seems to be a prognostic marker in patients with first myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.