Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34422333›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2021

Clinicopathological models for predicting lymph node metastasis in patients with early-stage lung adenocarcinoma: the application of machine learning algorithms.

Yuming Chong, Yijun Wu, Jianghao Liu, Chang Han, Liang Gong, Xinyu Liu, Naixin Liang, Shanqing Li

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuming ChongPeking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yijun WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jianghao LiuPeking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Chang HanPeking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Liang GongPeking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xinyu LiuPeking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Naixin LiangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Shanqing LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLymph node metastasis (LNM) status can be a critical decisive factor for clinical management of lung cancer. Accurately evaluating the risk of LNM during or after the surgery can be helpful for making clinical decisions. This study aims to incorporate clinicopathological characteristics to develop reliable machine learning (ML)-based models for predicting LNM in patients with early-stage lung adenocarcinoma.

methodsA total of 709 lung adenocarcinoma patients with tumor size ≤2 cm were enrolled for analysis and modeling by multiple ML algorithms. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve were used for evaluating model's predictive performance and clinical usefulness. Feature selection based on potential models was performed to identify most-contributed predictive factors.

resultsLNM occurred in 11.3% (80/709) of patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Most models reached high areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) >0.9. In the decision curve, all models performed better than the treat-all and treat-none lines. The random forest classifier (RFC) model, with a minimal number of five variables introduced (including carcinoembryonic antigen, solid component, micropapillary component, lymphovascular invasion and pleural invasion), was identified as the optimal model for predicting LNM, because of its excellent performance in both ROC and decision curves.

conclusionsThe cost-efficient application of RFC model could precisely predict LNM during or after the operation of early-stage adenocarcinomas (sensitivity: 87.5%; specificity: 82.2%). Incorporating clinicopathological characteristics, it is feasible to predict LNM intraoperatively or postoperatively by ML algorithms.

Indexed as

decision curve analysislymph node metastasis (LNM)machine learning algorithm (ML algorithm)Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)predictive model

Identifiers

PMID34422333
PMCPMC8339794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.