ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2021
Clinicopathological models for predicting lymph node metastasis in patients with early-stage lung adenocarcinoma: the application of machine learning algorithms.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- AI/ML advances in non-small cell lung cancer biomarker discovery.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- The development of machine learning in lung surgery: A narrative review.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Review
- Development and validation of a machine learning model to predict the risk of lymph node metastasis in renal carcinoma.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- Minor histological components predict the recurrence of patients with resected stage I acinar- or papillary-predominant lung adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Erratum to clinicopathological models for predicting lymph node metastasis in patients with early-stage lung adenocarcinoma: the application of machine learning algorithms.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLymph node metastasis (LNM) status can be a critical decisive factor for clinical management of lung cancer. Accurately evaluating the risk of LNM during or after the surgery can be helpful for making clinical decisions. This study aims to incorporate clinicopathological characteristics to develop reliable machine learning (ML)-based models for predicting LNM in patients with early-stage lung adenocarcinoma.
methodsA total of 709 lung adenocarcinoma patients with tumor size ≤2 cm were enrolled for analysis and modeling by multiple ML algorithms. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve were used for evaluating model's predictive performance and clinical usefulness. Feature selection based on potential models was performed to identify most-contributed predictive factors.
resultsLNM occurred in 11.3% (80/709) of patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Most models reached high areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) >0.9. In the decision curve, all models performed better than the treat-all and treat-none lines. The random forest classifier (RFC) model, with a minimal number of five variables introduced (including carcinoembryonic antigen, solid component, micropapillary component, lymphovascular invasion and pleural invasion), was identified as the optimal model for predicting LNM, because of its excellent performance in both ROC and decision curves.
conclusionsThe cost-efficient application of RFC model could precisely predict LNM during or after the operation of early-stage adenocarcinomas (sensitivity: 87.5%; specificity: 82.2%). Incorporating clinicopathological characteristics, it is feasible to predict LNM intraoperatively or postoperatively by ML algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.