Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34422190›Full record

ReviewThe Pan African medical journal2021

COVID-19 pandemic in Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) region: implication for capacity strengthening at Point of Entry.

Virgil Kuassi Lokossou, Aishat Bukola Usman, Issiaka Sombie, Moussiliou Noel Paraiso, Muhammad Shakir Balogun, Chukwuma David Umeokonkwo, Josephine Gatua, John Wagai, Edgard-Marius Ouendo, Patrick Nguku

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Pan African medical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Virgil Kuassi LokossouEconomic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) Regional Center for Disease Surveillance and Control, Abuja, Nigeria.
Aishat Bukola UsmanAfrican Field Epidemiology Network, Abuja, Nigeria.
Issiaka SombieWest African Health Organisation, Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Moussiliou Noel ParaisoInstitut Regional de Santé Publique, Ouidah, Bénin.
Muhammad Shakir BalogunAfrican Field Epidemiology Network, Abuja, Nigeria.
Chukwuma David UmeokonkwoAfrican Field Epidemiology Network, Abuja, Nigeria.
Josephine GatuaOverseas Development Institute, London, United Kingdom.
John WagaiWorld Health Organization, Nairobi, Kenya.
Edgard-Marius OuendoInstitut Regional de Santé Publique, Ouidah, Bénin.
Patrick NgukuAfrican Field Epidemiology Network, Abuja, Nigeria.
African Field Epidemiology Network · NGWest African Health Organisation · BFOverseas Development Institute · GB

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Free movement between countries without a visa is allowed within the 15-country Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) region. However, little information is available across the region on the International Health Regulation (IHR 2005) capacities at points of entry (PoE) to detect and respond appropriately to public health emergencies such as Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). ECOWAS and the member states can better tailor border health measures across the region by understanding public health strengths and priorities for improvement at PoEs. A comprehensive literature review was combined with a self-assessment of capacities at PoEs across the fifteen member states from February to July 2020. For the assessment, the member states completed an adapted World Health Organization (WHO) self-assessment checklist by classifying capacity for seven domains as fully, partially, or not implemented. The team implemented three focus group discussion (FGD) sessions and 13 key informant interviews (KII) with national-level border health stakeholders. Univariate analysis was used to summarize the assessment data and detailed content analysis was applied to evaluate FGD and KII results. Of the 15 member states, 3 (20%) are landlocked; 3 (20%) have more than one seaport. Eleven (73%) countries have 1 designated airport, 3 (20%) have two airports, and only one country (6.7%) has three airports. Two hundred and seventy-eight designated ground crossings were identified in 12 countries (80%). Strengths across the PoE were existence of decrees and ministerial acts in some ECOWAS countries and establishment of national taskforces for the COVID-19 response at PoE in ECOWAS. Major challenges were porous borders, poor intersectoral coordination, lack of harmonized traveler screening measures, shortage of staff, and inadequate financial resources. Despite all these challenges, there are opportunities such as leveraging the regional cross-border poliomyelitis coordination and control mechanism, and existence of networks of infection prevention and control specialists and field epidemiologists. However, political instabilities in some countries pose a threat to government commitments to PoE activities. The capacity to respond to public health emergencies at PoE in the ECOWAS region is still below IHR standard. Public health capacities at a majority of IHR-designated PoE in the 15-country region do not meet required core capacities standards.

Indexed as

Emigration and ImmigrationAfrica, WesternCapacity BuildingCOVID-19Focus GroupsHumansPublic Healthcapacity strengtheningCOVID-19 pandemicEpidemic managementpoint of entryWest Africa

Identifiers

PMID34422190
PMCPMC8363963
OpenAlexW3164288845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.