ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2021
Optimization of Online Education and Teaching Evaluation System Based on GA-BP Neural Network.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Powered Training Database for Clinical Thinking: App Development Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Retracted: Optimization of Online Education and Teaching Evaluation System Based on GA-BP Neural Network.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2023Article
- Design and Application of Artificial Intelligence Technology-Driven Education and Teaching System in Universities.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Design and Research of Mathematics Teaching Intelligent Classroom Based on PCA-NN Algorithm.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-08-02Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/A764A0B29F2E4EC10E6FDBF11B3769
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the popularization and application of online education in the world, how to evaluate and analyze the classroom teaching effect through scientific methods has become one of the important teaching tasks in colleges. Based on this, this paper studies the application of the GA-BP neural network algorithm. Firstly, it gives a brief overview of the current situation of online education and GA-BP neural network algorithm. Secondly, through the investigation of the online education system in many aspects, it evaluates students' online education classroom teaching quality from five aspects, and this paper proposes a more scientific online education classroom teaching quality evaluation optimization model and finally verifies the reliability of the online education teaching evaluation model through the practice in a university. The results show that the GA-BP neural network-based evaluation optimization model can effectively evaluate the online education in the process of analyzing the quality of online education classroom teaching of most professional students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.