Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34422018›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2021

iRGvalid: A Robust

Zhongxu Zhu, Keqin Gregg, Wenli Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Self-Normalizing Multi-Omics Neural Network for Pan-Cancer Prognostication.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhongxu ZhuXYZ Laboratory, Austin, TX, United States.
Keqin GreggXYZ Laboratory, Austin, TX, United States.
Wenli ZhouXYZ Laboratory, Austin, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAppropriate reference genes are critical to accurately quantifying relative gene expression in research and clinical applications. Numerous efforts have been made to select the most stable reference gene(s), but a consensus has yet to be achieved. In this report, we propose an

methodsiRGvalid takes advantage of high throughput gene expression data and is built on a double-normalization strategy. First, the expression level of each individual gene is normalized against the total gene expression level of each sample, followed by a target gene normalization to the candidate reference gene(s). Linear regression analysis is then performed between the pre- and post- normalized target gene across the whole sample set to evaluate the stability of the reference gene(s), which is positively associated with the

resultsHighly stable reference genes resulted in high Rt values regardless of the target gene used. The highest stability was achieved with a specific combination of 3 to 6 reference genes. A few genes were among the best reference genes across the cancer types studied here.

conclusioniRGvalid provides an easy and robust method to validate and identify the most stable reference gene or genes from a pool of candidate reference genes. The inclusivity of large expression data sets as well as the direct comparison of candidate reference genes makes it possible to identify reference genes with universal quality. This method can be used in any other gene expression studies when large cohorts of expression data are available.

Indexed as

cancergene expressionin silico reference gene selectionin silico reference gene validationreference genereference gene selectionreference gene validation

Identifiers

PMID34422018
PMCPMC8372526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.