Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34422011›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2021

Host Genetics of Response to Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome in Sows: Antibody Response as an Indicator Trait for Improved Reproductive Performance.

Felipe M W Hickmann, José Braccini Neto, Luke M Kramer, Yijian Huang, Kent A Gray, Jack C M Dekkers, Leticia P Sanglard, Nick V L Serão

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Selection for Resilience in Livestock Production Systems.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A genome-wide screen for resilient responses in growing pigs.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Felipe M W HickmannDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
José Braccini NetoDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Luke M KramerDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Yijian HuangSmithfield Premium Genetics, Rose Hill, NC, United States.
Kent A GraySmithfield Premium Genetics, Rose Hill, NC, United States.
Jack C M DekkersDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Leticia P SanglardDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Nick V L SerãoDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Iowa State University · USUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibody response to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus (PRRSV) infection, measured as sample-to-positive (S/P) ratio, has been proposed as an indicator trait for improved reproductive performance during a PRRS outbreak in Landrace sows. However, this result has not yet been validated in Landrace sows or evaluated in terminal sire lines. The main objectives of this work were to validate the use of S/P ratio as an indicator trait to select pigs during a PRRS outbreak and to explore the genetic basis of antibody response to PRRSV. Farrowing data included 2,546 and 2,522 litters from 894 Duroc and 813 Landrace sows, respectively, split into pre-PRRS, PRRS, and post-PRRS phases. Blood samples were taken from 1,231 purebred sows (541 Landrace and 690 Duroc) following a PRRS outbreak for subsequent PRRSV ELISA analysis for S/P ratio measurement. All animals had high-density genotype data available (29,799 single nucleotide polymorphisms; SNPs). Genetic parameters and genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for S/P ratio were performed for each breed separately. Heritability estimates (± standard error) of S/P ratio during the PRRS outbreak were moderate, with 0.35 ± 0.08 for Duroc and 0.34 ± 0.09 for Landrace. During the PRRS outbreak, favorable genetic correlations of S/P ratio with the number of piglets born alive (0.61 ± 0.34), number of piglets born dead (-0.33 ± 0.32), and number of stillborn piglets (-0.27 ± 0.31) were observed for Landrace sows. For Duroc, the GWAS identified a major quantitative trait locus (QTL) on chromosome (Chr) 7 (24-15 megabases; Mb) explaining 15% of the total genetic variance accounted for by markers (TGVM), and another one on Chr 8 (25 Mb) explaining 2.4% of TGVM. For Landrace, QTL on Chr 7 (24-25 Mb) and Chr 7 (108-109 Mb), explaining 31% and 2.2% of TGVM, respectively, were identified. Some of the SNPs identified in these regions for S/P ratio were associated with reproductive performance but not during the PRRS outbreak. Genomic prediction accuracies for S/P ratio were moderate to high for the within-breed analysis. For the between-breed analysis, these were overall low. These results further support the use of S/P ratio as an indicator trait for improved reproductive performance during a PRRS outbreak in Landrace sows.

Indexed as

GenomicsGWASoutbreakPRRSQTLreproductionS/P ratioswine

Identifiers

PMID34422011
PMCPMC8371708
OpenAlexW3192872896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.