ArticleFrontiers in genetics2021
Characterization and Comparative Analysis of Complete Chloroplast Genomes of Three Species From the Genus
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Complete chloroplast-based analysis reveals the emergence of candidate new species and revised divergence time in Vincetoxicum.Genes & genomics · 2026Article
- Complete mitochondrial genome assembly and analysis of Astragalus (Papilionoideae: Fabaceae) species revealed its RNA editing and phylogenetic implications.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Comparative Analysis and Phylogenetic Investigation of the Chloroplast Genome Sequences in FourCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- Differences in morphological characteristics, photosynthetic capacity and Chloroplast genomes reveal molecular markers to distinguish Angelica sinensis, A. acutiloba and A. gigas.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Molecular Insights into the Diversification and Biogeographic History of SixPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes reveals molecular evolution and phylogenetic relationships within the Papilionoideae of Fabaceae.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Morphological and phylogenetic analysis approach to three new species and a new section ofPhytoKeys · 2025Article
- Comparative chloroplast genome analyses ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- The complete mitochondrial genome and phylogenetic analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Article
- Assembly and comparative analysis of the first complete mitochondrial genome of Astragalus membranaceus (Fisch.) Bunge: an invaluable traditional Chinese medicine.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Complete plastome genomes of three medicinal heliotropiaceae species: comparative analyses and phylogenetic relationships.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Article
- A comparative plastome approach enhances the assessment of genetic variation in the Melilotus genus.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Great diverse rhizobial community nodulatingFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Complete Chloroplast Genome ofGenes · 2023Article
- Article
- Characterization and comparative analysis of the complete plastid genomes of four Astragalus species.PloS one · 2023Article
- First comparative analysis of complete chloroplast genomes among sixFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Astragalus is the largest genus in Leguminosae. Several molecular studies have investigated the potential adulterants of the species within this genus; nonetheless, the evolutionary relationships among these species remain unclear. Herein, we sequenced and annotated the complete chloroplast genomes of three
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.