Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34421576›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2021

Administration of

Hongwon Kim, Sumin Kim, Sang-Jun Park, Gwoncheol Park, Hakdong Shin, Myeong Soo Park, Jongpil Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effect ofInternational journal of medical sciences · 2026
    Trial
  3. The effects ofIBRO neuroscience reports · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Regulating the crosstalk betweenFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Host-Microbiome Interaction in the Intensive Care Unit.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hongwon KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Laboratory of Stem Cells and Cell Reprogramming, Dongguk University, Seoul, South Korea.
Sumin KimDepartment of Chemistry, Dongguk University, Seoul, South Korea.
Sang-Jun ParkResearch Center, BIFIDO Co., Ltd, Hongcheon, South Korea.
Gwoncheol ParkDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology, Sejong University, Seoul, South Korea.
Hakdong ShinDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology, Sejong University, Seoul, South Korea.
Myeong Soo ParkResearch Center, BIFIDO Co., Ltd, Hongcheon, South Korea.
Jongpil KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Laboratory of Stem Cells and Cell Reprogramming, Dongguk University, Seoul, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent evidence indicates that gut microbiota could interact with the central nervous system and affect brain function, including cognition and memory. In this study, we investigated whether

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseBifidobacteriumcognitive and memory impairmentgut microbiotaprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID34421576
PMCPMC8378450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.