Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34421565›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2021

Identifying Individuals With Mild Cognitive Impairment Using Working Memory-Induced Intra-Subject Variability of Resting-State EEGs.

Thanh-Tung Trinh, Chia-Fen Tsai, Yu-Tsung Hsiao, Chun-Ying Lee, Chien-Te Wu, Yi-Hung Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Brain-computer interface: an update for the clinicians.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Machine learning based on event-related oscillations of working memory differentiates between preclinical Alzheimer's disease and normal aging.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Non-Invasive Solutions to Identify Distinctions Between Healthy and Mild Cognitive Impairments Participants.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thanh-Tung TrinhNeural Engineering and Smart Systems Laboratory, Graduate Institute of Manufacturing Technology, College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology (Taipei Tech), Taipei, Taiwan.
Chia-Fen TsaiDepartment of Psychiatry, Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yu-Tsung HsiaoNeural Engineering and Smart Systems Laboratory, Graduate Institute of Mechatronic Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology (Taipei Tech), Taipei, Taiwan.
Chun-Ying LeeDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology (Taipei Tech), Taipei, Taiwan.
Chien-Te WuInternational Research Center for Neurointelligence (WPI-IRCN), The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study (UTIAS), The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yi-Hung LiuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (Taiwan Tech), Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are at high risk of developing into dementia (e. g., Alzheimer's disease, AD). A reliable and effective approach for early detection of MCI has become a critical challenge. Although compared with other costly or risky lab tests, electroencephalogram (EEG) seems to be an ideal alternative measure for early detection of MCI, searching for valid EEG features for classification between healthy controls (HCs) and individuals with MCI remains to be largely unexplored. Here, we design a novel feature extraction framework and propose that the spectral-power-based task-induced intra-subject variability extracted by this framework can be an encouraging candidate EEG feature for the early detection of MCI. In this framework, we extracted the task-induced intra-subject spectral power variability of resting-state EEGs (as measured by a between-run similarity) before and after participants performing cognitively exhausted working memory tasks as the candidate feature. The results from 74 participants (23 individuals with AD, 24 individuals with MCI, 27 HC) showed that the between-run similarity over the frontal and central scalp regions in the HC group is higher than that in the AD or MCI group. Furthermore, using a feature selection scheme and a support vector machine (SVM) classifier, the between-run similarity showed encouraging leave-one-participant-out cross-validation (LOPO-CV) classification performance for the classification between the MCI and HC (80.39%) groups and between the AD vs. HC groups (78%), and its classification performance is superior to other widely-used features such as spectral powers, coherence, and the complexity estimated by Katz's method extracted from single-run resting-state EEGs (a common approach in previous studies). The results based on LOPO-CV, therefore, suggest that the spectral-power-based task-induced intra-subject EEG variability extracted by the proposed feature extraction framework has the potential to serve as a neurophysiological feature for the early detection of MCI in individuals.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseasebetween-run similaritybrain-computer interfaceelectroencephalographyintra-subject variabilitymachine learningmild cognitive impairment

Identifiers

PMID34421565
PMCPMC8373435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.