Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34421544›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2021

New Insights Into the Roles of Microglial Regulation in Brain Plasticity-Dependent Stroke Recovery.

Fang Yu, Tingting Huang, Yuanyuan Ran, Da Li, Lin Ye, Guiqin Tian, Jianing Xi, Zongjian Liu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Sequential release ofMaterials today. Bio · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Low-Molecular-WeightFood science & nutrition · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Fang YuDepartment of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Tingting HuangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yuanyuan RanDepartment of Rehabilitation, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Da LiDepartment of Rehabilitation, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Lin YeSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.
Guiqin TianDepartment of Rehabilitation, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jianing XiDepartment of Rehabilitation, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zongjian LiuDepartment of Rehabilitation, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
China Rehabilitation Research Center · CNCapital Medical University · CNBeijing Institute of Technology · CNRenji Hospital · CNUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke remains the leading cause of long-term disability worldwide with significant long-term sequelae. However, there is no highly effective treatment to enhance post-stroke recovery despite extensive efforts in exploring rehabilitative therapies. Neurorehabilitation is recognized as the cornerstone of functional restoration therapy in stroke, where treatments are focused on neuroplastic regulation to reverse neural structural disruption and improve neurofunctional networks. Post-stroke neuroplasticity changes begin within hours of symptom onset and reaches a plateau by 3 to 4 weeks within the global brain in animal studies. It plays a determining role in spontaneous stroke recovery. Microglia are immediately activated following cerebral ischemia, which has been found both proximal to the primary ischemic injury and at the remote brain regions which have functional connections to the primary injury area. Microglia exhibit different activation profiles based on the microenvironment and adaptively switch their phenotypes in a spatiotemporal manner in response to brain injuries. Microglial activation coincides with neuroplasticity after stroke, which provides the fundamental base for the microglia-mediated inflammatory responses involved in the entire neural network rewiring and brain repair. Microglial activation exerts important effects on spontaneous recovery after stroke, including structural and functional reestablishment of neurovascular networks, neurogenesis, axonal remodeling, and blood vessel regeneration. In this review, we focus on the crosstalk between microglial activation and endogenous neuroplasticity, with a special focus on the plastic alterations in the whole brain network and their implications for structural and functional restoration after stroke. We then summarize recent advances in the impacts of microglial phenotype polarization on brain plasticity, trying to discuss the potential efficacy of microglia-based extrinsic restorative interventions in promoting post-stroke recovery.

Indexed as

inflammationmicroglianeuroplasticityrecoveryrehabilitationstroke

Identifiers

PMID34421544
PMCPMC8374071
OpenAlexW3189698361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.