ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2021
The Clinical Application of Robot-Assisted Ventriculoperitoneal Shunting in the Treatment of Hydrocephalus.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The clinical application of neuro-robot in the resection of epileptic foci: a novel method assisting epilepsy surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Trial
- Review
- Frameless stereotactic brain biopsy and external ventricular drainage placement using the RONNA G4 system.Journal of surgical case reports · 2022Article
- Application of the robot-assisted implantation in deep brain stimulation.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis work aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of robotic assistance in ventriculoperitoneal shunting and to compare the results with data from traditional surgery.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 60 patients who had undergone ventriculoperitoneal shunting, of which shunts were implanted using a robot in 20 patients and using traditional surgical methods in the other 40 patients. Data related to surgery were compared between the two groups, and the accuracy of the drainage tube in the robot-assisted group was assessed.
resultsIn the robot-assisted surgery group, the operation duration was 29.75 ± 6.38 min, intraoperative blood loss was 10.0 ± 3.98 ml, the success rate of a single puncture was 100%, and the bone hole diameter was 4.0 ± 0.3 mm. On the other hand, the operation duration was 48.63 ± 6.60 min, intraoperative blood loss was 22.25 ± 4.52 ml, the success rate of a single puncture was 77.5%, and the bone hole diameter was 11.0 ± 0.2 mm in the traditional surgery group. The above are statistically different between the two groups (
conclusionIn summary, robot-assisted implantation is accurate, simple to operate, and practical; the duration of surgery is short; trauma to the patient is reduced; and fewer postoperative complications related to surgery are reported.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.