Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34421515›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2021

Exploratory Radiomic Analysis of Conventional vs. Quantitative Brain MRI: Toward Automatic Diagnosis of Early Multiple Sclerosis.

Elizaveta Lavrova, Emilie Lommers, Henry C Woodruff, Avishek Chatterjee, Pierre Maquet, Eric Salmon, Philippe Lambin, Christophe Phillips

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Association of Spinal Cord Radiomic Features and Disability in Multiple Sclerosis.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizaveta LavrovaThe D-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Emilie LommersGIGA Cyclotron Research Centre In Vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Henry C WoodruffThe D-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Avishek ChatterjeeThe D-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Pierre MaquetGIGA Cyclotron Research Centre In Vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Eric SalmonGIGA Cyclotron Research Centre In Vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Philippe LambinThe D-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Christophe PhillipsGIGA Cyclotron Research Centre In Vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
University of Liège · BEMaastro Clinic · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) is poorly sensitive to pathological changes related to multiple sclerosis (MS) in normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) and gray matter (GM), with the added difficulty of not being very reproducible. Quantitative MRI (qMRI), on the other hand, attempts to represent the physical properties of tissues, making it an ideal candidate for quantitative medical image analysis or radiomics. We therefore hypothesized that qMRI-based radiomic features have added diagnostic value in MS compared to cMRI. This study investigated the ability of cMRI (T1w) and qMRI features extracted from white matter (WM), NAWM, and GM to distinguish between MS patients (MSP) and healthy control subjects (HCS). We developed exploratory radiomic classification models on a dataset comprising 36 MSP and 36 HCS recruited in CHU Liege, Belgium, acquired with cMRI and qMRI. For each image type and region of interest, qMRI radiomic models for MS diagnosis were developed on a training subset and validated on a testing subset. Radiomic models based on cMRI were developed on the entire training dataset and externally validated on open-source datasets with 167 HCS and 10 MSP. Ranked by region of interest, the best diagnostic performance was achieved in the whole WM. Here the model based on magnetization transfer imaging (a type of qMRI) features yielded a median area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 1.00 in the testing sub-cohort. Ranked by image type, the best performance was achieved by the magnetization transfer models, with median AUCs of 0.79 (0.69-0.90, 90% CI) in NAWM and 0.81 (0.71-0.90) in GM. The external validation of the T1w models yielded an AUC of 0.78 (0.47-1.00) in the whole WM, demonstrating a large 95% CI and a low sensitivity of 0.30 (0.10-0.70). This exploratory study indicates that qMRI radiomics could provide efficient diagnostic information using NAWM and GM analysis in MSP. T1w radiomics could be useful for a fast and automated check of conventional MRI for WM abnormalities once acquisition and reconstruction heterogeneities have been overcome. Further prospective validation is needed, involving more data for better interpretation and generalization of the results.

Indexed as

brain MRIhistological MRImultiple sclerosisquantitative MRIradiomic feature

Identifiers

PMID34421515
PMCPMC8374240
OpenAlexW3183427288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.