Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34421487›Full record

ReviewEJIFCC2021

Connectivity Strategies in Managing a POCT Service.

Rajiv Erasmus, Sumedha Sahni, Rania El-Sharkawy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EJIFCC, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rajiv ErasmusChemical Pathology, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Sumedha SahniIndependent Laboratory Consultant, Dubai, UAE.
Rania El-SharkawyChemical Pathology, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Point of Care Testing is increasingly being used for diagnosis and management of various disease states. Management of different Point of Care instruments at multiple sites can be challenging, particularly when such instruments are operated by non technical staff. Connectivity is critical for optimal management of these services which are intimately linked to operator training and competency and are important in minimising harm to the patient by reducing analytical errors. Furthermore, connectivity improves turn around time leading to faster decision making by physicians. Recent advances in technology such as 5G and artificial intelligence are likely to lead to a greater focus on personalized care as a result of big data analysis and development of algorithms.

Indexed as

connectivity point of care testingquality

Identifiers

PMID34421487
PMCPMC8343042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.