Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34420932›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Rates of turnover among general practitioners: a retrospective study of all English general practices between 2007 and 2019.

Rosa Parisi, Yiu-Shing Lau, Peter Bower, Kath Checkland, Jill Rubery, Matt Sutton, Sally J Giles, Aneez Esmail, Sharon Spooner, Evangelos Kontopantelis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Understanding persistent GP turnover using work and personal characteristics: a retrospective observational study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. What makes general practice work: the role of continuity in efficient and sustainable primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Primary care stability as a social determinant.Frontiers in health services · 2025
    Article
  9. Relationship between research activity and the performance of English general practices: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  10. GP working time and supply, and patient demand in England in 2015-2022: a retrospective study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rosa ParisiDivision of Informatics, Imaging & Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Yiu-Shing LauHealth Organisation, Policy and Economics (HOPE) Group, Centre for Primary Care & Health Services Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Peter BowerNIHR School for Primary Care Research, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Kath ChecklandNIHR School for Primary Care Research, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Jill RuberyAlliance Manchester Business School, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Matt SuttonHealth Organisation, Policy and Economics (HOPE) Group, Centre for Primary Care & Health Services Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Sally J GilesNIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Aneez EsmailNIHR School for Primary Care Research, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Sharon SpoonerNIHR School for Primary Care Research, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6965-3673
Evangelos KontopantelisDivision of Informatics, Imaging & Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK e.kontopantelis@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6450-5815

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo quantify general practitioners' (GPs') turnover in England between 2007 and 2019, describe trends over time, regional differences and associations with social deprivation or other practice characteristics.

designA retrospective study of annual cross-sectional data.

settingAll general practices in England (8085 in 2007, 6598 in 2019).

methodsWe calculated turnover rates, defined as the proportion of GPs leaving a practice. Rates and their median, 25th and 75th percentiles were calculated by year and region. The proportion of practices with persistent high turnover (>10%) over consecutive years were also calculated. A negative binomial regression model assessed the association between turnover and social deprivation or other practice characteristics.

resultsTurnover rates increased over time. The 75th percentile in 2009 was 11%, but increased to 14% in 2019. The highest turnover rate was observed in 2013-2014, corresponding to the 75th percentile of 18.2%. Over time, regions experienced increases in turnover rates, although it varied across English regions. The proportion of practices with high (10% to 40%) turnover within a year almost doubled from 14% in 2009 to 27% in 2019. A rise in the number of practices with persistent high turnover (>10%) for at least three consecutive years was also observed, from 2.7% (2.3%-3.1%) in 2007 to 6.3% (5.7%-6.9%) in 2017. The statistical analyses revealed that practice-area deprivation was moderately associated with turnover rate, with practices in the most deprived area having higher turnover rates compared with practices in the least deprived areas (incidence rate ratios 1.09; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.13).

conclusionsGP turnover has increased in the last decade nationally, with regional variability. Greater attention to GP turnover is needed, in the most deprived areas in particular, where GPs often need to deal with more complex health needs. There is a large cost associated with GP turnover and practices with very high persistent turnover need to be further researched, and the causes behind this identified, to allow support strategies and policies to be developed.

Indexed as

General PracticeGeneral PractitionersCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPersonnel TurnoverRetrospective Studieshealth economicshealth policyhuman resource managementorganisation of health servicesprimary care

Identifiers

PMID34420932
PMCPMC8362689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.