Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34420927›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Interorganizational Knowledge Sharing to Establish Digital Health Learning Ecosystems: Qualitative Evaluation of a National Digital Health Transformation Program in England.

Kathrin Cresswell, Aziz Sheikh, Bryony Dean Franklin, Marta Krasuska, Hung The Nguyen, Susan Hinder, Wendy Lane, Hajar Mozaffar, Kathy Mason, Sally Eason and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Engaging the disability community in informatics research: rationales and practical steps.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kathrin CresswellUsher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6634-9537
Aziz SheikhUsher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7022-3056
Bryony Dean FranklinSchool of Pharmacy, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2892-1245
Marta KrasuskaUsher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1481-3507
Hung The NguyenInstitute for the Study of Science, Technology and Innovation, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6936-6068
Susan HinderInstitute for the Study of Science, Technology and Innovation, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8451-2027
Wendy LaneNational Health Services Arden and Greater East Midlands Commissioning Support Unit, Warwick, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3538-4820
Hajar MozaffarBusiness School, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6400-5260
Kathy MasonNational Health Services Arden and Greater East Midlands Commissioning Support Unit, Warwick, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7754-6966
Sally EasonNational Health Services Arden and Greater East Midlands Commissioning Support Unit, Warwick, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4891-4103
Henry PottsInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6200-8804
Robin WilliamsInstitute for the Study of Science, Technology and Innovation, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9044-4611

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe English Global Digital Exemplar (GDE) program is one of the first concerted efforts to create a digital health learning ecosystem across a national health service.

objectiveThis study aims to explore mechanisms that support or inhibit the exchange of interorganizational digital transformation knowledge.

methodsWe conducted a formative qualitative evaluation of the GDE program. We used semistructured interviews with clinical, technical, and managerial staff; national program managers and network leaders; nonparticipant observations of knowledge transfer activities through attending meetings, workshops, and conferences; and documentary analysis of policy documents. The data were thematically analyzed by drawing on a theory-informed sociotechnical coding framework. We used a mixture of deductive and inductive methods, supported by NVivo software, to facilitate coding.

resultsWe conducted 341 one-on-one and 116 group interviews, observed 86 meetings, and analyzed 245 documents from 36 participating provider organizations. We also conducted 51 high-level interviews with policy makers and vendors; performed 77 observations of national meetings, workshops, and conferences; and analyzed 80 national documents. Formal processes put in place by the GDE program to initiate and reinforce knowledge transfer and learning have accelerated the growth of informal knowledge networking and helped establish the foundations of a learning ecosystem. However, formal networks were most effective when supported by informal networking. The benefits of networking were enhanced (and costs reduced) by geographical proximity, shared culture and context, common technological functionality, regional and strategic alignments, and professional agendas.

conclusionsKnowledge exchange is most effective when sustained through informal networking driven by the mutual benefits of sharing knowledge and convergence between group members in their organizational and technological setting and goals. Policy interventions need to enhance incentives and reduce barriers to sharing across the ecosystem, be flexible in tailoring formal interventions to emerging needs, and promote informal knowledge sharing.

Indexed as

EcosystemState MedicineAdministrative PersonnelEnglandHumansKnowledgedigital transformationhealth systemlearning ecosystem

Identifiers

PMID34420927
PMCPMC8414305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.