Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34420924›Full record

Trial reportJMIR mHealth and uHealth2021

Effects of a Personalized Smartphone App on Bowel Preparation Quality: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Quirine E W van der Zander, Ankie Reumkens, Bas van de Valk, Bjorn Winkens, Ad A M Masclee, Rogier J J de Ridder

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03677050 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Individualized Patient Education Including Drinking Advice Using an App

TypeinterventionalSponsorMaastricht University Medical CenterRan2018 to 2019Enrolled180ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsSmart phone patient education application
NCT06569277 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effects of a Smartphone Mobile Application on Quality of Bowel Preparation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorDr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research HospitalRan2024 to 2024Enrolled104ConditionsBowel Preparation, Patient Experience, Patient SatisfactionArmsA mobile application
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Quirine E W van der ZanderDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8640-5521
Ankie ReumkensDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3326-3793
Bas van de ValkDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1661-9919
Bjorn WinkensDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6747-6228
Ad A M MascleeDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5819-0116
Rogier J J de RidderDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8715-9342
Maastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdequate bowel preparation is essential for the visualization of the colonic mucosa during colonoscopy. However, the rate of inadequate bowel preparation is still high, ranging from 18% to 35%; this may lead to a higher risk of missing clinically relevant lesions, procedural difficulties, prolonged procedural time, an increased number of interval colorectal carcinomas, and additional health care costs.

objectiveThe aims of this study are to compare bowel preparation instructions provided via a personalized smartphone app (Prepit, Ferring B V) with regular written instructions for bowel preparation to improve bowel preparation quality and to evaluate patient satisfaction with the bowel preparation procedure.

methodsEligible patients scheduled for an outpatient colonoscopy were randomized to a smartphone app group or a control group. Both the groups received identical face-to-face education from a research physician, including instructions about the colonoscopy procedure, diet restrictions, and laxative intake. In addition, the control group received written information, whereas the smartphone app group was instructed to use the smartphone app instead of the written information for the actual steps of the bowel preparation schedule. All patients used bisacodyl and sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate as laxatives. The quality of bowel preparation was scored using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) by blinded endoscopists. Patient satisfaction was measured using the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-18.

resultsA total of 87 patients were included in the smartphone app group and 86 in the control group. The mean total BBPS score was significantly higher in the smartphone app group (mean 8.3, SD 0.9) than in the control group (mean 7.9, SD 1.2; P=.03). The right colon showed a significantly higher bowel preparation score in the smartphone app group (mean 2.7, SD 0.5 vs mean 2.5, SD 0.6; P=.04). No significant differences were observed in segment scores for the mean transverse colon (mean 2.8, SD 0.4 vs mean 2.8, SD 0.4; P=.34) and left colon (mean 2.8, SD 0.4 vs mean 2.6, SD 0.5; P=.07). General patient satisfaction was high for the smartphone app group (mean 4.4, SD 0.7) but showed no significant difference when compared with the control group (mean 4.3, SD 0.8; P=.32).

conclusionsOur personalized smartphone app significantly improved bowel preparation quality compared with regular written instructions for bowel preparation. In particular, in the right colon, the BBPS score improved, which is of clinical relevance because the right colon is considered more difficult to clean and the polyp detection rate in the right colon improves with improvement of bowel cleansing of the right colon. No further improvement in patient satisfaction was observed compared with patients receiving regular written instructions.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03677050; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03677050.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsSmartphoneCatharticsColonoscopyHumansProspective StudiesCatharticsbowel preparationcolonoscopylaxativesmHealthmobile phonepatient satisfactionrandomized controlled trialsmartphonesmartphone application

Identifiers

PMID34420924
PMCPMC8414298
OpenAlexW3166025748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.