ArticleAnnals of Saudi medicine
Association of toll-like receptor 4, 5 and 10 polymorphisms with
Article in Annals of Saudi medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Pathogenicity ofWorld journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- New Promising Routes in Peptic Ulcers: Toll-like Receptors and Semaphorins.Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
objectiveInvestigate the susceptibility and severity of
designAnalytical, cross-sectional.
settingEndoscopy clinic at tertiary care center. PATIENTS AND
methodsGenomic DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues collected from
main outcome measuresEffect of genotype distribution on SAMPLE SIZE: 250 peptic ulcer patients and 217 controls.
resultsThe
conclusionsOur findings are consistent with differences in severity of LIMITATIONS: Lack of CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: None.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.