Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34420385›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2021

Rhythm and timing as vulnerabilities in neurodevelopmental disorders.

Miriam D Lense, Eniko Ladányi, Tal-Chen Rabinowitch, Laurel Trainor, Reyna Gordon

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Distinct Rhythmic Competencies Identified via Internet-Based Assessment.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Miriam D LenseDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Eniko LadányiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Tal-Chen RabinowitchSchool of Creative Arts Therapies, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Laurel TrainorDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Reyna GordonDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Kennedy Center · DKHaifa Medical Center · ILPediatrics and Genetics · USSociety for Neuroscience · US

Funding

Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jeffrey L Neul · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
Biomarkers of Rhythmic Communication: Integrating Foundational and Translational ApproachesDP2HD098859 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI GORDON, REYNA LEIGH · 2018 to 2018
$2.4M
Musical Rhythm Sensitivity to Scaffold Social Engagement in Autism Spectrum DisorderR61MH123029 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI JONES, WARREN, LENSE, MIRIAM · 2019 to 2020
$1.2M
Social Rhythmic Entrainment and Language Development in Autism Spectrum DisordersR21DC016710 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI LENSE, MIRIAM · 2018 to 2020
$540k
CIHR RTI-2017-00643NICHD NIH HHS DP2 HD098859NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC016710NIMH NIH HHS R61 MH123029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Millions of children are impacted by neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), which unfold early in life, have varying genetic etiologies and can involve a variety of specific or generalized impairments in social, cognitive and motor functioning requiring potentially lifelong specialized supports. While specific disorders vary in their domain of primary deficit (e.g. autism spectrum disorder (social), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (attention), developmental coordination disorder (motor) and developmental language disorder (language)), comorbidities between NDDs are common. Intriguingly, many NDDs are associated with difficulties in skills related to rhythm, timing and synchrony though specific profiles of rhythm/timing impairments vary across disorders. Impairments in rhythm/timing may instantiate vulnerabilities for a variety of NDDs and may contribute to both the primary symptoms of each disorder as well as the high levels of comorbidities across disorders. Drawing upon genetic, neural, behavioural and interpersonal constructs across disorders, we consider how disrupted rhythm and timing skills early in life may contribute to atypical developmental cascades that involve overlapping symptoms within the context of a disorder's primary deficits. Consideration of the developmental context, as well as common and unique aspects of the phenotypes of different NDDs, will inform experimental designs to test this hypothesis including via potential mechanistic intervention approaches. This article is part of the theme issue 'Synchrony and rhythm interaction: from the brain to behavioural ecology'.

Indexed as

PeriodicityTimeComorbidityHumansNeurodevelopmental DisordersTime Factorsautism spectrum disorderdevelopmental coordination disorderlanguage disordersneurodevelopmental disordersrhythmsynchrony

Identifiers

PMID34420385
PMCPMC8380970
OpenAlexW3193341057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.