Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34420195›Full record

ReviewPaediatric drugs2021

Targeted Therapy in Pediatric AML: An Evolving Landscape.

LaQuita M Jones, Katherine Tarlock, Todd Cooper

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Paediatric drugs, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

LaQuita M JonesDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9877-9558
Katherine TarlockClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9717-2973
Todd CooperClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA. Todd.Cooper@seattlechildrens.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1203-2371
Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa · ZACincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USSeattle Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The outcomes associated with pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have improved over the last few decades, with the implementation of intensive chemotherapy, hematopoietic stem cell transplant, and improved supportive care. However, even with intensive therapy and the use of HSCT, both of which carry significant risks of short- and long-term side effects, approximately 30% of children are not able to be cured. The characterization of AML in pediatrics has evolved over time and it currently involves use of a variety of diagnostic tools, including flow cytometry and comprehensive genomic sequencing. Given the adverse effects of chemotherapy and the need for additional therapeutic options to improve outcomes in these patients, the genomic and molecular architecture is being utilized to inform selection of targeted therapies in pediatric AML. This review provides a summary of current, targeted therapy options in pediatric AML.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteChildCombined Modality TherapyHumans

Identifiers

PMID34420195
OpenAlexW3195182354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.