Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34420182›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2021

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Cefiderocol.

Muhammad Bilal, Lobna El Tabei, Sören Büsker, Christian Krauss, Uwe Fuhr, Max Taubert

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sanitation, antibiotics, and the end of the antibiotic era.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Treating Extensively Drug-ResistantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Alternative iron-depleted media for cefiderocol susceptibility testing.International journal of antimicrobial agents · 2024
    Article
  18. Optimizing Antibiotic Therapy forAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Muhammad BilalDepartment I of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Center for Pharmacology, University of Cologne, Gleueler Straße 24, 50931, Cologne, Germany.
Lobna El TabeiDepartment I of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Center for Pharmacology, University of Cologne, Gleueler Straße 24, 50931, Cologne, Germany.
Sören BüskerDepartment I of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Center for Pharmacology, University of Cologne, Gleueler Straße 24, 50931, Cologne, Germany.
Christian KraussDepartment I of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Center for Pharmacology, University of Cologne, Gleueler Straße 24, 50931, Cologne, Germany.
Uwe FuhrDepartment I of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Center for Pharmacology, University of Cologne, Gleueler Straße 24, 50931, Cologne, Germany.
Max TaubertDepartment I of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Center for Pharmacology, University of Cologne, Gleueler Straße 24, 50931, Cologne, Germany. max.taubert@uk-koeln.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8925-7782
University of Cologne · DEUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cefiderocol is a new broad-spectrum cephalosporin antibiotic with promising activity against various Gram-negative bacteria including carbapenem-resistant strains. A chlorocatechol group in the C-3 side chain provides cefiderocol with a siderophore activity, improving its stability against β-lactamases and facilitating the transportation of cefiderocol across outer bacterial membranes. Cefiderocol shows linear pharmacokinetics over a broad range of clinically relevant doses, with unchanged renal excretion constituting the main route of elimination. Geometric means (coefficient of variation) of the volume of distribution and clearance in individuals with normal kidney function were 15.8 (15%) L and 4.70 (27%) L/h, respectively. In patients with end-stage renal disease, clearance was 1.10 (24%) L/h. Time above the minimum inhibitory concentration is the main predictor of efficacy. There is no evidence for clinically relevant interactions of cefiderocol with other drugs mediated by metabolizing enzymes or drug transporters. Simulations based on population pharmacokinetic modeling suggest that dosing regimens should be adjusted based on kidney function to optimize therapeutic exposure to cefiderocol. Clinical efficacy trials indicated that cefiderocol is non-inferior to imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections and acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis, and to meropenem in the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia. In the one study currently available, cefiderocol performed similarly to the best available therapy in the treatment of severe carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections regarding clinical and microbiological efficacy. In summary, cefiderocol shows favorable pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties and an acceptable safety profile, suggesting that cefiderocol might be a viable option to treat infections with bacteria resistant to other antibiotics.

Indexed as

Gram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefiderocolCephalosporinsGram-Negative BacteriaHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefiderocolCephalosporins

Identifiers

PMID34420182
PMCPMC8613110
OpenAlexW3195806432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.