Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34420170›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Tetrabromobisphenol A: a neurotoxicant or not?

Mengqi Dong, Yuanyuan Li, Min Zhu, Zhanfen Qin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mengqi DongState Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 18, Shuangqing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100085, China.
Yuanyuan LiState Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 18, Shuangqing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100085, China.
Min ZhuState Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 18, Shuangqing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100085, China.
Zhanfen QinState Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 18, Shuangqing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100085, China. qinzhanfen@rcees.ac.cn.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNResearch Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences · CN

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2018YFA0901103National Natural Science Foundation of China (CN) 21876196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although some regulatory agencies have claimed that consumer exposures to tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) are not likely to cause adverse health effects in humans or the environment, the safety of tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) has been questioned. Here, we summarize the literature concerning in vivo and in vitro neurotoxicity of TBBPA over the past decades. Most laboratory rodent studies reported that gavage administration of TBBPA at doses below 1000 mg/kg/day generally exerted no or limited effects on neuropathology and locomotor behaviors, but increased anxiety and auditory impairments were observed in several studies. In fish and amphibians, waterborne exposure to TBBPA was generally reported to disrupt neurodevelopment and lead to neurobehavioral alterations. Moreover, in vitro studies support the observations that TBBPA could exert neurotoxic effects in vertebrates. Thus, we suggest that TBBPA could have adverse effects on the nervous system in vertebrates. Given rapid excretion and low availability of TBBPA in laboratory rodents following single gavage administration, we speculate that single-daily gavage could result in an underestimation of the neurotoxic effects of TBBPA in rodents. Thus, we propose to employ multiple-daily administration routes (such as dermal, inhalation, and drinking water), to further assess the neurotoxic effects of TBBPA in mammals.

Indexed as

Flame RetardantsAnimalsHumansPolybrominated BiphenylsFlame RetardantsPolybrominated Biphenylstetrabromobisphenol AAquatic organismsGavageNeurotoxicityRodentsTetrabromobisphenol A

Identifiers

PMID34420170
OpenAlexW3195164079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.