Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34420138›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2022

Exploratory analysis of clinical benefit of ipilimumab and nivolumab treatment in patients with metastatic melanoma from a single institution.

C M Vila, F A Moreno, M M Estébanez, G R Ares, G Villacampa, P Dashti, H S Oberoi, R Martin-Huertas, P Jares, L Alos and 7 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

C M VilaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain. claramartinezvila@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9775-2166
F A MorenoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
M M EstébanezDepartment of Oncology, Galdakao Hospital, Galdakao, Galdakao, Spain.
G R AresDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
G VillacampaOncology Data Science, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.
P DashtiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
H S OberoiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
R Martin-HuertasDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
P JaresDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
L AlosDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
C TeixidoDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
R RullDepartment of General Surgery, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
M SanchezDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
J MalvehyDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
E CarceleroDepartment of Pharmacy, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
I ValduviecoDepartment of Radiotherapy, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
A A FernandezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESAlthaia · ESHospital de Galdakao · ESHospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias · ESMayo Clinic · USUniversitat Pompeu Fabra · ESVall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe retrospectively analysed overall survival (OS) and potential predictive biomarkers of OS in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with ipilimumab plus nivolumab in a single institution. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Electronic medical records of patients with advanced melanoma receiving ≥ 1 dose of a combined ipilimumab plus nivolumab regimen between March 3, 2016 and March 7, 2020 in a single institution, were reviewed. OS was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Sub-group analyses were conducted to examine several endpoints according to relevant clinical, molecular and pathological variables using logistic and Cox models.

resultsForty-four cases were reviewed, 38 (86.4%), of whom had cutaneous melanoma, 21 (47.7%) were BRAF mutant, 21 (47.7%) presented high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) values, 23 (52.3%) had ≥ 3 disease sites, and 10 (22.7%) patients had brain metastases. The median follow-up was 37.7 months, and the median OS was 21.1 months (95% CI 8.2-NR). In the multivariate analysis, the OS was significantly longer in patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0, LDH ≤ upper limit of normal, absence of liver metastases and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) < 5 (all p ≤ 0.05, log-rank test). These factors allowed the classification of patients into three prognostic risk groups (low/intermediate/high risk) for death.

conclusionOverall survival of real-world patients from our cohort receiving ipilimumab plus nivolumab was lower than in previous studies. The ECOG score, LDH values, the presence of liver metastases and the NLR were independent prognostic factors for survival.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsIpilimumabMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNivolumabRetrospective StudiesSkin NeoplasmsSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsIpilimumabNivolumabInmunotherapyIpilimumab and Nivolumab combination treatmentMelanoma

Identifiers

PMID34420138
OpenAlexW3195285213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.