ArticleLasers in medical science2022
Laser-Doppler microvascular flow of dental pulp in relation to caries progression.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dental Pulp Vascular Response to Early Stages of Caries.International dental journal · 2024Article
- Analysis of the Pulpal Blood Flow Microdynamics during Prosthetic Tooth Preparation Using Diamond Burs with Different Degrees of Wear.Dentistry journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulpal blood supply can be measured noninvasively and objectively via laser-Doppler fluxmetry. The aim of the study was to measure and compare pulpal laser-Doppler (LD) flux values for permanent non-carious teeth and carious teeth with different degrees of caries progression. Conventional sensitivity tests were also conducted for a comparative analysis to clarify the difference between tooth sensitivity and vitality. Carious lesions were detected and assessed in 15 adult subjects using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) criteria. Pulpal sensitivity of selected carious teeth (without previous prosthetic restoration or endodontic treatment) and suitable caries-free teeth were then tested with a cold stimulus and subsequently with a weak electric current, whereas their pulpal LD flux was recorded at a separate visit using individually designed silicone probe holders. The LD flux values for teeth with an ICDAS score 6 were significantly lower compared to the values for teeth with an ICDAS score 1 (p < 0.05). Pulpal LD flux values of teeth with active caries were significantly lower than those of teeth with solely inactive carious lesions (p < 0.05). The degree of agreement between sensitivity and vitality testing was fair within both of the pairs: cold test/LDF (κk = 0.232, p = 0.00) and electric test/LDF (κk = 0.354, p = 0.00). Pulpal LD flux measurement proved to be reliable in the pulp vitality assessment of carious and non-carious teeth and might improve the reliability of clinical decisions when used in addition to standard clinical diagnostic protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34420126What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.