ArticleSurgery today2021
Is surgery justified for elderly patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? Reappraisal from a viewpoint of comorbidity and organ function.
Article in Surgery today, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnosis and Treatment of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A National Survey from the Korean Pancreatobiliary Association.Gut and liver · 2024Article
- Preoperative Myosteatosis and Prognostic Nutritional Index Predict Survival in Older Patients With Resected Biliary Tract Cancer.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe benefit of surgery for older patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC) has not been established and the differences in the general condition of younger vs. older patients remain unclear.
methodsPatients who underwent curative surgery for EHCC were divided into two groups according to age: those younger than 75 years old (younger group) and those aged 75 years or older (older group). We analyzed the clinical data of the two groups retrospectively.
resultsAmong the 116 patients analyzed, 45 (38.8%) were in the older group. Regarding comorbidity, only cardiac disease was significantly more common in the older patients; however, the cardiac function of the two groups was identical. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of kidney and lung disease, but renal function was significantly deteriorated and the incidence of the mixed ventilatory defect was significantly greater in the older group. The overall 5-year survival rates for the younger and older groups were 52.4% vs. 50.4% of all cholangiocarcinoma patients (p = 0.458), 42.4% vs. 51.3% of those with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (p = 0.718), and 69.0% vs. 49.1% of those with distal cholangiocarcinoma (p = 0.534), respectively.
conclusionsImproved survival after surgery can be expected in well-selected older cholangiocarcinoma patients. Comorbidities were not necessarily reflected in organ function, with precise organ function assessment being more important when selecting surgical candidates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.