ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2021
Repair of long bone defects of large size using a tissue-engineered periosteum in a rabbit model.
Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anti-Infection Efficacy, Osteogenesis Potential, and Biocompatibility of 3D Printed PLGA/Nano-Hydroxyapatite Porous Scaffolds Grafted with Vancomycin/DOPA/rhBMP-2 in Infected Rabbit Bone Defects.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Article
- The impact of autogenous bone grafts on the regeneration of radial bone defects in rabbits compared to autogenous advanced platelet-rich fibrin plus.Open veterinary journal · 2025Article
- Efficacy of a gelatin-based hemostatic sponge and hydroxyapatite-chitosan nanocomposites (nHAp/CS) on regeneration of radial bone defects in rabbits.Open veterinary journal · 2025Article
- Fabrication Strategies for Engineered Thin Membranous Tissues.ACS applied bio materials · 2023Review
- Construction of artificial periosteum with methacrylamide gelatin hydrogel-wharton's jelly based on stem cell recruitment and its application in bone tissue engineering.Materials today. Bio · 2023Article
- Mesenchymal stem cells: Emerging concepts and recent advances in their roles in organismal homeostasis and therapy.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Review
- Periosteum and development of the tissue-engineered periosteum for guided bone regeneration.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2022Review
- Nanocomposites of Chitosan/Graphene Oxide/Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles/Blackberry Waste Extract as Potential Bone Substitutes.Polymers · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tissue engineering is a promising approach for bone regeneration. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether tissue engineered periosteum (TEP), which was fabricated by combining osteogenically-induced mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) with porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS), could restore long bone defects of large size in rabbits. Twenty-four adult New Zealand white rabbits (NZWRs) were used in the experiments. Long bone defects of large size (30 mm-50 mm; average, 40 mm) were established on both sides of NZWRs' radii. The defects were treated with TEP (Group A), allogeneic deproteinized bone (DPB, Group B), TEP combined with DPB (Group C), and pure SIS (Group D). The healing outcome was evaluated by radiography and histological examination at 4, 8, and 12 weeks post-treatment. The radiographical findings showed that bone defects of large size were all repaired in Groups A, B and C within 12 weeks, whereas Group D (pure SIS group) failed to result in defect healing at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Although there was some new bone regeneration connecting the allografts and bone ends, as observed under radiographical and histological observations, bone defects of large sizes were restored primarily by structurally allografted DPB within 12 weeks. The TEP groups (Groups A and C) showed partial or total bone regeneration upon histological inspection. Based on 12-week histological examinations, significantly more bone was formed in Group A than Group C (P < 0.05), and both groups formed significantly more bone than in Groups B and D. The results indicated that long bone defects of a large size could be restored by TEP or TEP combined with the DPB scaffold, and such materials provide an alternative approach to resolving pathological bone defects in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.