ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2021
Trinets encode orchard phylogenetic networks.
Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- When are Quarnets Sufficient to Reconstruct Semi-directed Phylogenetic Networks?Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2025Article
- Clustering systems of phylogenetic networks.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2023Article
- Constructing phylogenetic networks via cherry picking and machine learning.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2023Article
- Autopolyploidy, Allopolyploidy, and Phylogenetic Networks with Horizontal Arcs.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2023Article
- The tree of blobs of a species network: identifiability under the coalescent.Journal of mathematical biology · 2022Article
- Classes of explicit phylogenetic networks and their biological and mathematical significance.Journal of mathematical biology · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rooted triples, rooted binary phylogenetic trees on three leaves, are sufficient to encode rooted binary phylogenetic trees. That is, if [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are rooted binary phylogenetic X-trees that infer the same set of rooted triples, then [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are isomorphic. However, in general, this sufficiency does not extend to rooted binary phylogenetic networks. In this paper, we show that trinets, phylogenetic network analogues of rooted triples, are sufficient to encode rooted binary orchard networks. Rooted binary orchard networks naturally generalise rooted binary tree-child networks. Moreover, we present a polynomial-time algorithm for building a rooted binary orchard network from its set of trinets. As a consequence, this algorithm affirmatively answers a previously-posed question of whether there is a polynomial-time algorithm for building a rooted binary tree-child network from the set of trinets it infers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34420100What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.